In the context of recent terrorist attacks in France & after a week of outrage in Muslim countries over the Charlie Hebdo caricature, @EmmanuelMacron gave a long interview to @AJArabic today to counter misunderstandings and misinformation about his recent statements. Key points:
1/ Macron started by recalling that France had been attacked multiple times by extremists who were distorting the message of Islam and regretted that disinformation had been spread on social media about the situation.
2/ He recalled the roots of FR secularism based on the protection of freedom of speech & freedom of religion: a long struggle between the state and the Catholic Church and where caricatures on all religions (& politicians) are a tradition.
3/ Macron said he understood the emotion of Muslims about caricatures but stressed that the role of French authorities is to protect individual freedoms. The French government is not responsible for the caricatures but is responsible for protecting the right to publish them.
4/ Important quote (rough translation): « I consider that society must be tolerant and respectful but it is not my role as a president to limit the freedom to draw because some are offended. If I do that, step by step, we will extinguish freedom of speech »
5/ He emphasise the issue was to have a debate on these caricatures and build understanding & tolerance in society. The issue is not to ban the caricatures.
6/ He answered a Q on double standard btwn Islam & Judaism. Macron said satire & denialism were different. There are caricatures about all religions incl. Judaism but holocaust denial & hate speech are illegal. Hate speech against Muslims are prosecuted as much as antisemitism.
7/ Macron explained France is looking at its own history with a clear eye. It’s role in WWII as well as during the colonisation are explicitly acknowledged by French authorities.
8/ Macron sais lies had led some groups to exploit the situation & call for boycott of FR products. They want to boycott a country and its people because a free journalist used his right to draw. Freedom of press in FR cannot be suppressed, unlike it is in other countries.
9/ Macron stressed that FR sent a message of appeasement and friendship to Muslim countries but political and religious leaders in these countries also have to act responsibly and push back against lies and speeches that are directly or indirectly calling for violence.
10/ He recalled his speech on “separatism” targeted extremist groups who refuse the law of their country, not French Muslims, who have the same rights as all French citizens and deserve the same opportunities.
11/ He acknowledged the French system has to be improved (racism, jobs,...) but its foundations have a long history and coherence. It protects the rights of all, it is not meant to target a religion but to host citizens who can live together and not only next to each other.
12/ Macron expressed FR solidarity to Turkey in the earthquake context. He also questioned Erdogan’s behaviour as a NATO ally (#Syria, #Libya, #EastMed), wishing appeasement but stressing European unity & sovereignty.
13/ Macron ended by recalling the multiple historical, cultural and human ties between France and Muslim countries. He said he had himself supported ongoing cooperation projects in the academic field, including when it comes to the study of Islamic civilisation.
In essence : refusal of violence; understanding of emotions but uncompromising protection of freedom of speech ; all worshipers are protected in FR, incl Muslims; defense of FR specifics & Republican model ; clear eye on FR challenges but push back against foreign explotation.
Final word: On such a sensitive topic I advise everyone to watch the entire interview before twitting or writing an article. Do not stop at the one sentence tweets Al Jazeera will have picked. I could not capture everything in just few tweets. (End)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles Thépaut

Charles Thépaut Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @diplocharlie

28 Oct
THREAD – One of the many questions related to the #US election next week is the future of American engagement in the #MiddleEast. All actors in the region are already hedging their bets. But what about #Europe’s interest in the Middle East & North Africa ?
Through 50+ interviews, I have looked back at the evolution of transatlantic cooperation in the MENA region since the end of the Cold War & tried in this @WashInstitute piece to assess the potential implications of the US election next week. washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysi…
Let’s start with a paradox: while for many in the MENA, Europe & the US represent the « West », there is no clear “Western” framework of cooperation about the Middle East.
Read 23 tweets
27 Oct
I understand @ishaantharoor may not have chosen the title and that presenting this as a clash of two leaders’ ego is catchy. But this is missing major issues, at least four of them :
1/ How it started: there is a constant disregard in reports for the fact that FR-TUR tensions started and continue in Northeastern #Syria because Ankara’s milit interventions disturbed the fight c/ #ISIS. Why is it important ?
Because the US was the main player on the ground and the failure to find an understanding with TUR led to the escalation we saw in October 2019 when TUR intervened and the US withdrew without consulting its European allies.
Read 15 tweets
14 Oct
I have been in DC for more than a year now and I'm struck by the soul searching going on in the US expert community regarding what to do in the #MiddleEast. Numerous articles discuss a potential #US "withdrawal" from the Middle East. Here is a thread and a reading list:
A first dimension of this debate is a 2016 article from Andrew J Bacevich, making a general case against interventionism and a call to "end endless wars". foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
But I feel that the discussion intensified in 2019 when voices like @Martin_Indyk, a Peace Process veteran, echoed similar concerns based on the analysis that only few vital American interests were still at stake in the Middle East.
wsj.com/articles/the-m…
Read 18 tweets
11 Sep
This OpEd is misleading in so many ways...I’ll try to recall few elements :
1/ For a smarter read on the French-German division of labor, @JosephdeWeck explains why you need military solidarity with Greece AND mediation efforts with Turkey. internationalepolitik.de/en/pariscope-h…
2/ A more serious analysis of the rethoric wld show TUR officials started issuing insulting statements against Macron personally in 2019, while his own statements focused on policy disagreements with TUR. There are simply no “rhetorical broadsides against Erdogan”.
Read 23 tweets
6 Aug
Sérieux les gars, les clichés sur le mandat français et OSS117 c’est un peu court pour commenter la visite du PR au à #Beyrouth, et c’est quand même d’un grand manque de respect pour ce que vivent les Libanais depuis plusieurs mois, pour plusieurs raisons:
Le niveau de destruction causée par l’explosion dans une zone éco essentielle et la profondeur de la crise politique et sociale libanaise devraient inviter à regarder ce que cette visite permet et ce qu’elle dit de la situation, et pas se regarder le nombril français.
Ceux qui s’intéressent sincèrement au Liban savent qu’une crise politique sans précédent est en cours depuis le début du mouvement de protestation en octobre, notamment suscité par l’exaspération face à la crise éco et la mauvaise gouvernance, également rappelée par l’explosion.
Read 11 tweets
24 Jun
(THREAD) 1/ In this article for @ForeignPolicy on #Syria, I discuss a complicated but immensely important topic: the weaponization of humanitarian assistance by the Syrian regime. Spoiler: things CAN be fixed. #SyriaConf2020 foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/24/how…
2/ Three paradoxes: i/UN/NGOs do great work assisting millions but accept regime hijacking of aid ii/EU&US provided $30bn of UN aid since 2011 but don't push back on aid diversion iii/UN/NGOs centralize ops in Damascus but don't fix the system & ignore a fragmented huma reality.
3/ i/ The huma response in #Syria is a logistical masterpiece & an ethical conundrum: the UN has set one of the most robust coordination systems but the huma community is paralyzed on diversion, despite multiple reports 👉 @HaidHaid22 @hrw @TheSyriaCmpgn @ScprSyria @annie_sparrow
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!