1/ "MEV is theft"

I see two approaches being taken to handle the Miner Extractable Value (MEV) problem

The first is democratizing access to MEV while the second is the prevention of MEV

Let's talk about some of the naunces at play here 👇
2/ MEV encapsulates many different types of activity into a broad bucket

There is beneficial / neutral MEV in the form of DEX arbitrage and liquidations

Then there is negative / harmful MEV in the form of front-running and censorship
3/ Neutral / beneficial MEV provides users optimal exchange rates on DEXs and ensures undercollateralized loans get liquidated protecting the DeFi ecosystem

Negative / harmful MEV leads to greater slippage on DEX trades, higher gas fees, and the censorship of transactions
4/ The fact that MEV is such a large category of activity is what causes most of the disagreements about how it should be handled imo

Those in the camp of wanting to democratize MEV see it as an inevitable unavoidable fact of life, so might as well make it equitable/equal access
5/ This is where flashbots and MEV auctions come into play

Flashbots allow users to pay miners directly to submit bundles of transactions

MEV auctions (MEVA) auction off the right of transaction ordering in an entire block to the highest bidder
6/ The primary advantage from MEV democratization is that it helps prevent gas price auction wars

This is where bots today continuously raise the transaction fee they're willing to pay to get their transaction processed first to extract the MEV, raising fees for all
7/ Flashbots and MEV Auctions prevent on-chain gas price auction wars similarly

With Flashbots it's dependent on who bribes the miner more off-chain, with MEV Auctions, it's who bribes the network more

This lowers network congestion and lowers the gas costs for users
8/ However an important point is that these solutions do not prevent MEV from occuring, it's not designed to

These approaches make MEV much more common, because it's purposely made more accessible

This is fine if you're under the assumption MEV is inevitable, but is it?
9/ The other approach I see being taken is to prevent MEV in the first place through solutions such as @Chainlink's Fair Sequencing Services

This approach not only aims to mitigate gas price auction wars but at the same time prevent negative/harmful MEV
10/ In FSS, the creation of blocks is separated from the ordering of transactions in those blocks by delegating transaction ordering to a Decentralized Oracle Network (DON)

These DONs use a preconceived notion of fairness, such as first in the mempool, to order transactions
11/ This can be combined with the encryption of transactions, so nodes within a DON have no context regarding the types of transactions they are ordering

The transactions are only decrypted after ordering has occurred
12/ Through such solutions, neutral/beneficial MEV can still happen such as arbitrage and liquidations without on-chain gas price auction wars, while negative / harmful MEV like front-running can be completely eliminated
13/ With FSS, censorship can be prevented by encryption and also allowing transactions to be submitted on-chain (instead of to the DON) but are required to experience a speed bump, which prevents such transactions from frontrunning fairly ordered transactions
14/ This thread is obviously an oversimplification of a very complicated issue, however suffice to say I am not in the camp of thinking MEV is an unavoidable issue

Admitting defeat now will just result in Ethereum becoming no different than the traditional financial system today
15/ I would like to make clear, the democratization of neutral / beneficial MEV is complimentary with preventing malicious / harmful MEV

I believe the decentralization of transaction ordering is the solution that can achieve both goals, which FSS follows closely

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChainLinkGod.eth 2.0

ChainLinkGod.eth 2.0 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChainLinkGod

20 May
Today in #Chainlink 🔗

"We’re proud to award a @Chainlink Community Grant to the @GreenWorldOrg, an ambitious project that is showcasing how hybrid smart contracts can be leveraged to reverse the effects of climate change"

Smart contracts = better planet
blog.chain.link/reversing-clim…
"The grant will help fund Green World Campaign’s regenerative agriculture project AIRS—a hybrid smart contract application that uses satellite data to automatically dispense financial rewards to people who successfully regenerate designated areas of land"

Built with @initc3org
"@Benchmark_DeFi will leverage #Chainlink oracle data feeds to derive the inputs for rebasing, utilizing the iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX), a measure of expected stock market volatility based on S&P 500 index options"

$MARK $LINK
medium.com/benchmarkproto…
Read 5 tweets
18 May
Today in #Chainlink 🔗

"By being one of the initial protocols to leverage @chainlink on #Avalanche, @BenqiFinance will decentralize one of the fundamental components within the protocol: the price oracle"

Native support @avalancheavax 🔥

$QI $AVAX $LINK
benqifinance.medium.com/benqi-will-use…
"We are excited to announce that @beyondfinanceio is now using #Chainlink Price Feeds to accurately and securely price all of our platform’s synthetic assets during the minting, swapping, redeeming, and/or liquidation processes"

$BYN $LINK
bfinance.medium.com/beyond-finance…
"In @SergeyNazarov’s view, definitive truth that is “acceptable to both counterparties” is “what’s necessary and sufficient for everything to move forward in a better way” than the current status quo, where a bank gets to unilaterally decide what happens"
chainlinktoday.com/chainlink-co-f…
Read 4 tweets
17 May
Today in #Chainlink 🔗

"@PundiXLabs is using and supporting newly launched @chainlink Price Feeds for $PUNDIX/USD (live today) to accurately distribute platform rewards denominated in the native PUNDIX token"

Incentivized blockchain governance
medium.com/pundix/pundi-x…
"The @wise_token lending and borrowing smart contract will utilize #Chainlink Price Feeds to determine the real-time value of assets, enabling it to issue fair market loans and secure its liquidation mechanism"

Native price feeds #BSC + #Polkadot
devinmarty.medium.com/wise-token-wil…
"Today, we are super excited to launch @LuchadoresNFT alongside the use of #Chainlink VRF to create #NFT collectables that are truly randomly generated at the time of purchase, with 100% of the art and metadata stored on the #Ethereum blockchain"

medium.com/@LuchadoresNFT…
Read 8 tweets
16 May
1/ Interesting discussion today with @elonmusk about the differences between #Bitcoin and #Dogecoin in regards to decentralization and the ability to serve as a new digitally-native money for the people

Here are some additional nuances on the subject
2/ As one of the people who helped bootstrap @PayPal to where it is today, I understand Elon's perspective regarding the traditional centralized currencies like $USD in the context of payments

But blockchains are entirely different technology with very different considerations
3/ Blockchains are designed to be inherently decentralized, censorship resistant, and permissionless in order to lower the barrier of entry for financial activity

Centralized finance does not reflect these values due to its centralized, censorable, and permissioned nature
Read 13 tweets
15 May
"Proof of Stake = rich get richer" is an example of a half-truth

It paints a human societal problem as something that's unique to Proof of Stake (it's not)

Proof of Work has the same exact problem with ASICs, but arguably worse because of economies of scale for energy usage
Yes it's true that PoW miners need to sell a *portion* of their mined coins to stay profitable, but ultimately the profit margins between PoW and PoS will be extremely similar

PoW's higher selling pressure simply means more buyers are needed in order to just keep the price flat
With EIP-1559 burning the base fees of transactions, PoS systems can be deflationary, off-setting this problem by granting *everyone* a higher percentage of the supply over time

Having captial always means you can generate more capital, this is not at all unique to PoS *or* PoW
Read 8 tweets
15 May
Today in #Chainlink 🔗

"The initial integration involves @FloatProtocol leveraging the widely-used $ETH/USD @Chainlink Price Feed to power our monetary policy and price stabilisation mechanisms"

A volatility-dampened stablecoin with a $FLOAT-ing value 🤔
medium.com/float-protocol…
"@DafiProtocol's algorithmic distribution model secured by #Chainlink’s decentralized data feeds opens up a new type of token distribution mechanism that creates much needed long-term incentives for supporting decentralized networks"

$DAFI $LINK
dafiprotocol.medium.com/dafi-protocol-…
"By integrating #Chainlink VRF, we (@OfficialZeroDEX) ensure that ALL Launchpad participants have a provably fair and unbiased chance at being selected as a winner of various IDO allocations"

Verifiably verified by VRF
$ZERO $LINK
medium.com/@OfficialZeroD…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(