In the late 90s as a grad student I became interested in the utility of #analytic_philosophy as a language and method of presentation and looked to how other traditions used it - a thread on #Indian_philosophy 1/
I began reading the work of Bimal Krishna Matilal (1935-1991), who had studied traditional logic and mastered it as a Tarkatirtha at Sanskrit College in Calcutta by the early 1960s 2/
Another major figure in modern Indian philosophy JN Mohanty has this highly useful reminiscence of that time and Matilal’s approach sjsu.edu/people/anand.v… 2a/
He then went to Harvard for his PhD on the #navya_nyaya doctrine of negation; there he became acquainted by Quine (1908-2000) and his work on logic as an abstract continuation of the work of the empirical sciences 3/
Most of his works were written as a fellow of #AllSouls and Spalding Professor at #Oxford where he interacted with major figures like Peter Strawson (1919-2006) and Michael Dummett (1925-2011) for who he wrote Perception 4/
The work is a study of pramana and a defence of Nyaya-Vaisesika realism against Buddhist idealism and thus an intervention in epistemology, philosophy of language and also to an extent metaphysics 5/
It was through his work that I realised Indian philosophy was not primarily about #Vedanta and #mysticism but included #analytic schools such as #Nyaya 6/
Much of his earlier work concerns logic and the study of language such as his introduction to logic that is broadly based on Kneale and Kneale - logic is for him inference patterns, rules of debates and refutation of sophistical argument placed in a historical context 7/
Hence much of his work on #Buddhist logic and epistemology 8/
Perhaps the first work of his that i read was The Word and the World - perhaps his sense of mortality motivated the desire to establish ‘India’s contribution to the study of language’ 9/
As it was it presented the view of philosophers and grammarians on sphota - and I remember an early conversation with the late John Cooper on it that alerted me to the possibility of philosophy of language as a way to read Arabic grammar as well as legal theory 10/
Most of those usul al-fiqh texts had extensive discussions on meaning, the successful nature of utterances, the very nature and function of language where it came for and what it was for 11/
Of course he still wrote on metaphysics, mysticism and ethics - in fact two volumes published posthumously indicated his interests beyond mere refutation 12/
Matilal’s work alerts us to the possibilities within the #analytic tradition as well as ways to make sense of a non-western tradition of #philosophy and the ways in which #philology can be deployed for #philosophical analysis 13/
None of #Plato dialogues were fully translated into Arabic or Persian in the classical period - and on that we have ‘Abd al-Rahman Badawi’s classic study - a short thread on #Persian translation 1/
The lives of the two modern #Persian translators of #Plato can be rather instructive on the nature of modern #iranian intellectual history 2/
The first of these was Mahmud Sana’i (1918-1985) who attended Alborz College, later studying philosophy and literature at Tehran University and then doing a PhD in psychology in #London 3/
Some further thoughts on the links of #IslamicPhilosophy in #Iran and #NorthIndia relating to Mīr Muḥammad Bāqir Dāmād Astarābādī (d. 1631), who is far less known than his student Mullā Ṣadrā (d. 1636) 1/
Despite being the Shaykh al-islām of Iṣfahān late in life and a leading jurist of his time - he was the grandson of the first major jurist of the Safavid empire Shaykh Nūr al-dīn ʿAlī al-Karakī (d. 1534) - his work remains little known 2/
One of the peculiarities of his fame and work is the appearance in North India of his work al-Ufuq al-mubīn leading some (including myself I must admit) to talk of a 'school of Mīr Dāmād' in India academia.edu/1270535/Mir_Da… 3/
Slowly it seems that interest in Islamic thought - the rational disciplines including philosophy and logic - in India is growing, and the recent book by Shankar Nair is a good indication towards it #IslamicPhilosophy#India 1/
His chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy is also a very positive approach; now a number of older works discussed the contributions of Indian scholars to the intellectual traditions in Islam oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/o… 2/
Apart from works that focused on outlining the texts in the curricula and method known as the dars-e niẓāmī of which there are plenty especially in Urdu and some mentions in works by Francis Robinson and Jamal Malik brill.com/view/title/150 3/
The Chishtī Ṣābirī Sufi Shāh Muḥibbullāh Ilāhābādī is perhaps one of the most celebrated figures in Mughal intellectual history, acting as a confluence of the school of #IbnArabi#Avicennism and engagement with the court and #PersoIndica 1/
He is actually presented within the long and significant engagement with the school of #IbnArabi in North India and juxtaposed (at least in the much later reformist historiography) against the 'Naqshbandī' reaction of Shaykh Aḥmad Sirhindī (d. 1624) against monism 2/
He is sometimes co-opted into the polemics between the rigid 'Islamicity' of Aurangzeb and the 'liberal' tradition of Akbar and Dārā Shikoh - as one sees here jstor.org/stable/4414114… in which liberal is short for syncretic 2a/
We already have a number of important studies but first we should mention the highly important Perso-Indica project based in Paris and Bonn perso-indica.net
This is a great resource 2/
Then, of course, there is @AudreyTruschke work that is in many ways seminal in the turn to the Sanskrit sources to make sense of the intellectual and cultural history 3/
Alongside the #ExeterTehranConvos I’m been thinking about the nature of philosophy and research in #Iran within the context of the reception of #European philosophy - thread on #philosophy in #Iran 1/
And the ways in which continental philosophy dominated in an earlier period due to the influence of the #Heideggerians and the circle of #AhmadFardid (1909-1994) many of whom became prominent in the committee for the cultural revolution after 1979 2/
But since then - and it seems perhaps a bit of a surprise that #Soroush was a major figure in the support of #analytic_philosophy then - #Anglophone philosophy is gaining an upper hand 3/