The Americans with Disabilities Act (#ADA) was signed into law 31 years ago today by President George H.W. Bush.
The law was meant to improve access to everyday life, work and our democracy, but voters with disabilities are still fighting to remove barriers to voting. #ADA31
Arizona enacted a law this year that removes voters from the state's permanent early voting list (PEVL) more frequently & requires more steps to obtain a mail ballot. This law creates deliberate barriers for disabled voters in the state. #AZLeg#ADA31
Signature match laws and witness requirements also restrict the freedom to vote for Americans with disabilities. In 2020, CLC filed lawsuits in multiple states in response to these measures. #ADA31
During #Election2020, North Dakota used an error-prone signature match process that created barriers for voters with disabilities like multiple sclerosis (MS).
CLC represented voters and local organizations to challenge this law...and won. #NDPol#ADA31
In Rhode Island, CLC challenged a restrictive witness requirement that would have exposed disabled voters like Miranda Oakley to unnecessary health risks during #COVID19.
Our suit struck down this barrier for Miranda & many others.
#OTD in 2020, we launched #StopSecretSpending, a web project that shows the importance of transparency & accountability in our elections. It also helps explain why we need to stop #DarkMoney.
Not familiar with dark money & its impact? Our new explainer video can catch you up:
Since the site went live last year, Americans have seen the most expensive #election cycle in history, with over $14.4 billion spent.
Over $1 billion of that was non-disclosed #DarkMoney.
83% of voters across partisan and demographic lines want to know who is making political contributions to organizations that spend to influence voters.
Unfortunately, #SecretSpending continues to rig our political system in favor of wealthy special interests.
Today, #SCOTUS will share decisions for two cases that directly impact the freedom to vote and ensuring transparency in campaign finance: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, and Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta.
Here's what's at issue:
Let's start with Brnovich v. DNC.
The outcome of this case will determine if Section 2 of the #VotingRightsAct, which provides protection against racial discrimination in voting, is still a viable tool for protecting the freedom to vote.
As @PaulSmithCLC & @JaydenHohnson wrote in a recent analysis: "The Brnovich case is an opportunity for the Court to make clear that the VRA leaves no room for racial disadvantage in our elections, and that the importance of democratic equality rises above the political fray."
#HR1 will protect access to the fundamental right to vote. It would ensure voters can always register on Election Day and are not wrongfully purged from voter rolls. The bill would also expand the right to vote by mail to every eligible voter. 2/ campaignlegal.org/update/safe-an…
#HR1 will end partisan gerrymandering & ensure #FairMaps for all. H.R.1 requires the establishment of an independent redistricting commission (IRC) in each state, a reform essential to restoring confidence that every vote matters. Learn more about IRCs: 3/ campaignlegal.org/democracyu/acc…
#BREAKING: We just filed an @FEC complaint alleging the Trump campaign secretly hid the ultimate recipients of nearly $170 million in spending. Unlawful secrecy is unacceptable for any presidential campaign; our transparency laws must be enforced. campaignlegal.org/update/clc-fil…
The Trump campaign reported millions in payments to firms headed by Trump’s former campaign manager, Brad Parscale, and other firms, who disbursed funds to the campaign’s ultimate vendors. This had the effect of hiding millions in payments.
We’ve asked the @FEC—the only federal agency dedicated to enforcing the laws governing presidential campaigns—to take action. However, the @FEC lacks a quorum and cannot take action. We need a strong, reformed @FEC to protect the integrity of our elections. #FixTheFEC
.@maddow just reported on our complaint, being filed tomorrow w/ the @FEC, calling for an investigation into the convoluted relationship between Mercer-backed John Bolton super PAC and Cambridge Analytica (also primarily owned by Mercer).
Our complaint says the John Bolton super PAC violated election laws. Thom Tillis/NC GOP & John Bolton Super PAC used Cambridge Analytica’s services. It seems @CamAnalytica used information from its work for Thom Tillis/NC GOP to develop the John Bolton Super PAC pro-Tillis ads.
Super PACS can accept unlimited contributions if they are independent but if super PACs can coordinate spending with campaigns, they can get around laws that limit the amount of money candidates can take. That’s what the John Bolton Super PAC did here.
CLC's @waltshaub met with Chair @TGowdySC and Ranking Member @RepCummings of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today, laying out 13 actions that would strengthen government ethics in the U.S. bit.ly/2hoetZz
Action #1-- It's critical to insulate the Director of @OfficeGovEthics from potential political retaliation
Action #2-- OGE needs to be able to communicate directly with Congress so that it can raise concerns about the activities of the Executive Branch, offer solutions, and discuss its budget without needing permission from another agency.