The report was written by the OGSR panel, comprised of two expert foresters who undertook the most extensive review of forest policy ever done in BC from the fall of 2019 to spring 2020.
Government sat on the report for more than four months, before publishing it Sept.11, 2020.
The report is good. Its assessment of the status quo as unsustainable and call for a paradigm shift echoed what the environmental movement has been saying for decades. #bcpoli
After some initial vagueness, Premier @jjhorgan promised to implement the report "in its entirety" on the campaign trail in the provincial election last October.
Here's the thing: the OGSR report has specific, deliverable deadlines.
In a few clunky stages, the @bcndp has announced some deferrals, but they fall wildly short of Recommendation 6.
Saying the measures government's taken so far live up to the report is like spending an hour folding paper planes, and then saying you own a commercial airline.
The initial round of deferrals, announced in conjunction with the report's release, contained a laughably small amount of old-growth that's actually at risk.
It was swiftly criticized by leading independent scientists in the field:
Since then, a handful of other old-growth areas have been deferred in Spuzzum Valley, the Central Walbran and Fairy Creek, mainly due to a combination of Indigenous leadership and federal pressure. #bcpoli#oldgrowth
But the B.C. public has long understood that the old-growth crisis is not about a handful of watersheds but rather an ecological crisis that requires a complete shift away from the destruction of high-productivity old-growth forests.
We no longer have time for a few hundred hectares at a time and slow, gradual, incremental steps just aren't a luxury the BC government can afford anymore.
This brings us to the @bcndp's main rationale for its slowness on #oldgrowth: Indigenous rights. #bcpoli
On the election debate stage last fall, Premier @jjhorgan said every tree in BC grows in the territory of a First Nation, and any conservation requires sign-off from the title-holders.
But here's the catch: it's currently a double-standard, because that's not what logging is held to.
Forestry plans do not require Indigenous consent, and while companies have to consult Nations on their cutting plans, they don't need to receive a 'yes.'
In BC, most First Nations have stake in logging in their territory. Far from their rightful place as decision-maker + main beneficiary, this role is often limited to revenue-sharing agreements with government, through which communities receive some of the $ generated by logging.
Most Nations only receive a tiny fraction of the wealth extracted from their forests, but this means a lot, providing needed revenue and sometimes other benefits like jobs.
The @bcndp's current approach forces Nations to turn this down if they want to protect their old-growth.
As a settler, this is extremely frustrating, as the @bcndp approach essentially pretends as though colonialism never happened.
After a couple hundred years of having resources stolen and their territories degraded, few Nations are in a position to turn down sources of revenue.
The choice the BC government is offering is not a fair one. Substantial funding is required to support First Nations making these deliberations, to ensure calling for deferrals doesn't mean a harmful loss of revenue for their communities.
This has been called for repeatedly by the @UBCIC and a host of organizations. No response from the @bcndp government.
Long term planning for forestry and the permanent protection of #oldgrowth forests, like anything to do with the land, requires Nation-to-Nation negotiation and the return of land to Indigenous peoples.
This process will take a lot of work, and some necessary time.
But time is exactly what at-risk old-growth forests don't have.
In the year since government received the OGSR report, old-growth logging permits jumped by more than 40%.
There's now less old-growth for the government and First Nations to talk about.
The OGSR panel called for immediate deferral of at-risk #oldgrowth to provide some breathing room to start these conversations.
Their report frames deferrals as a starting point, a tool to create a safe space to talk, without non-renewable old-growth falling in the meantime.
The @bcndp government has torqued this, framing deferrals as something only to happen after months if not years of process, with status quo destruction continuing while that happens.
A senior ministry bureaucrat once referred to deferrals as "the nuclear option."
While government talks, the climate and biodiversity crises rage. Much of BC burns.
The @UBCIC has again demanded government move faster, calling for deferrals in line with the OGSR recommendations.
The federal @liberal_party, recognizing the extreme unpopularity of the @bcndp's approach on old-growth, made this an issue on week one of the federal election campaign, shrewdly associating the @NDP with their provincial counterparts on old-growth. #cdnpoli#elxn44
There are a few bright spots.
Nations like the Squamish, Kwakiutl, Tli'ammon and Nuxalk have all called for old-growth deferrals in their territories, raising the pressure on the @bcndp to do this.
In June, the province announced the formation of a science panel to guide its deferral process. The composition of the panel is legitimate, and their involvement is a sign of hope.
The number of irreplaceable groves that have been destroyed in the last 18 months breaks my heart. #bcpoli
Cabinet ministers and MLAs continue to provide misleading and incorrect information on old-growth to the public (some examples of which are in the blog below) and lean back on the tired environment-vs-jobs mantra of the 1990's.
LONG THREAD about forest industry jobs, based on Stats Can data:
1/30
So I'm looking at numbers on logging levels and forest sector employment for some research I'm doing, and comparing how many jobs are created by logging in different provinces.
2/30 The data is from this Stats Can data set, which lets you toggle between the numbers for logging (by volume or by area), employment, inventory, investment and other values.
3/30 I'm particularly interested in efficiency --not in the standard sense under capitalism, but with regard to the actual value this industry provides to our communities, in exchange for it's huge impacts, which anyone who follows me on here will be aware of my thoughts about.
Some morning thoughts about #wildfires and forest management in #bcpoli:
About a month ago I started playing drop in soccer again.
My first night there, there were three guys I didn’t know, talking about setting wedges + other things I know to be associated with falling trees.
I asked them if they were arborists, or if they worked in the forest industry.
They said neither, they are forest fire fighters on the local crew. This was a couple days before the heat dome, and we talked about how busy they expected fire season to get in the coming weeks.
They haven’t been at soccer since, and, as there are mercifully fewer fires here on the Island, I assume that’s because they are redeployed to the interior, where hundreds of fires are raging.
Of the part that is, about half won’t ever be logged, as it’s either bog or high elevation forest with small, expensive-to-access trees that the industry doesn’t want.
2/5 Along with smaller trees, these forests contain less of the other values we associate with old-growth: biodensity and carbon storage, cultural resources, recreation and tourism potential.
They aren’t unimportant, but they are not what we collectively value as old-growth.
3/5 of the other half of remaining old-growth, about two thirds is protected, and again, this includes a lot of that bog/high elevation forest that has its own importance, but has less of the values that iconic old-growth contains.
Yesterday I attended a morning vigil on the Caycuse Main, a logging road on unceded Ditidaht territory that leads into one of the blockade locations on the south Island where old-growth logging is being resisted by grassroots activists and Indigenous land defenders. #oldgrowth
I arrived just before 7am, shortly after the vigil began. I learned that the plan was to hold space on the road, turn away industry vehicles (one was turned away when I was there) but not to hold a firm blockade if told by the RCMP to move.
1/ I’m in an intensive 50 hour wilderness first aid course this week. When I got to class today and told some of my classmates about the federal government’s purchase of the #KinderMorgan#pipeline, most of them asked “wait, so they bought it so they can block it?” #StopKM
2/ It seemed intuitive to all of them that given the government knows and promotes the fact that we need to be emitting less pollution, it would be in its interest to buy a project designed to do the opposite, and then cancel it.
When I explained that no, the government has...
3/ ...bought a project deemed too risky and uncertain for #KinderMorgan’s investors in order to guarantee it is forced through against the wishes of Nations that have never given consent and through communities that have not given permission, I could see their faces drop in...