In an article in THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR, spectator.org/so-you-want-a-…, Scott McKay writes:
“We’re going to find out over the next three years, with the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential cycle, just how far removed we are from a return to
“We’re going to find out over the next three years, with the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential cycle, just how far removed we are from a return to
something akin to constitutional governance under the principles of federalism and whether it can be reclaimed.”
It's sad, but predictable, that people just can't bring themselves to face the facts.
Scott, we already know how far we are removed from constitutional governance.
It's sad, but predictable, that people just can't bring themselves to face the facts.
Scott, we already know how far we are removed from constitutional governance.
Infinitely far. To embrace constitutional governance is to repeal the New Deal, the Great Society, and just about everything else the U.S. govt. does. That is not going to happen. You know that as well as I do.
If you want to live in a country with constitutional governance, it’s going to have to be a different country. One that isn’t named “The United States of America.” One that doesn’t have the Star Spangled Banner as its flag. One that repudiates the country we are in now.
There is one loophole: we could kill enough #Democratic voters to make them a permanent minority at the polls. Say 20M more of them than they kill of us once #CivilWar2 starts. Me, I prefer National Divorce to #Holocaust2.
But forget about winning at the polls. That's fantasy.
But forget about winning at the polls. That's fantasy.
We've been losing for 90 years. The country isn't going to do a 180. So it's divorce, mass murder, or #DementiaJoe's America.
I vote for divorce.
I vote for divorce.
@threadreaderapp unroll please
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
