I would like to distill what we know, what we do not know, and what this all means for you right now.
2/On 11/26/21, the @WHO officially designated B.1.1.529 (#omicron) a "variant of concern."
It cited a "large number of mutations, some of which are concerning" and "preliminary evidence" of "an increased risk of reinfection with this variant.."
3/In short, scientists are concerned because #omicron exhibits an unusual number of mutations across the #SARSCoV2 genome, with >30 on the spike protein.
The spike is the part of the virus that allows it to gain access to human cells and reproduce. (h/t @_nference)
4/Some of the mutations are well characterized with a known impact (transmission, immune evasion, etc.), but others were rarely observed until now and not well characterized, so their full significance is uncertain.
6/These mutations, combined with increasing case rates and positivity rates in Gauteng, South Africa, give rise to concern around this new variant.
It has not yet been detected in the US, but at this point, it is a matter of "when," not "if" it will be.
7/There are a number of open questions that will take scientists time to understand.
For the umpteenth time in the #COVID19 pandemic, we are about to see the scientific process unfold before our eyes and in real time.
8/One question is whether #omicron exhibits higher transmissibility than even the #delta variant.
Early, inferential evidence suggests that it may, but more complete epidemiological analysis is needed to quantify this and arrive at a more precise reproductive rate.
9/Another question is whether #omicon leads to more severe illness.
Preliminary, anecdotal reports from providers in different countries suggest no difference in acuity, with unvaccinated patients at higher risk. This needs more study. news24.com/news24/southaf…
10/A big question on everyone's mind is around immune system evasion--whether from vaccine-derived or virally derived immunity.
Immunologists emphasize that the immune response is multi-faceted, so even lower neutralizing titers may still mean a strong T-cell response.
11/A related question is whether #omicron will be susceptible to treatments.
There is some concern around reduced effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies.
It's too early to know about forthcoming therapies, like the oral antiviral from Merck.
12/We also want to know whether currently available diagnostic tests will identify #omicron.
13/Likewise, the PCR testing that @MEPublicHealth performs will also identify #COVID19 if it happens to be caused by #Omicron.
14/The other big question is assessing the extent of spread already, and/or being on the lookout in the US and #Maine. That is done via genomic sequencing.
-It's important to note that many variants generated a fair amount of concern initially, but later proved not to be drivers of spread/serious disease.
We should take the same approach here: gather data around key questions first, then react.
16/For example, this graphic from @_nference notes other variants and their spike protein mutations. #omicron has a higher number, but we need data to know how that translates to transmission.
17/Also, even if if the individual-level severity from #omicron isn't different from delta, anything that causes more cases can lead to more hospitalizations even if the percentage affected remains the same.
18/The other thing to keep in mind is the evolutionary tradeoff between transmissibility and lethality.
A pathogen with a high case fatality rate kills off its host so quickly that it's unable to spread. We need data to know where #omicron lies on that spectrum.
19/What does this all mean for you?
First, know the facts. Trust reputable sources.
Second, the core tools (vaccination, masking, testing, ventilation, distancing) are likely the same ones we'll need for omicron.
20/If you haven't been vaccinated, do so. If you have, get a booster.
When you're in an indoor public setting, wear a mask.
Maintain ventilation/circulation indoors.
We don't yet know whether #omicron is a difference of degree or a difference of kind.
Stay tuned.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/A recurring refrain I hear about #COVID19#vaccines is, "Why should I get the shot since I can still get COVID after?"
I want to discuss why that isn't exactly an accurate assessment why it doesn't accord with the way that most of us think about risk in our daily lives.
2/Let's start with the core notion: that you can still get #COVID19 after being fully #vaccinated.
That is true. But the statement lacks critical context. While you can still get COVID after getting a vaccine, you are MUCH less likely to do so.
The relative risk matters.
3/At baseline, the #COVID19 vaccines have an effectiveness of around 80-90%.
Vaccine effectiveness is a measure derived from clinical trials and calculates the relative risk of being affected in a vaccinated population vs. an unvaccinated one.
1/We are all tired of #COVID19. But the virus, sadly, is not done with us.
If you're looking to help your fellow Mainers through this difficult time, there's something you can do: volunteer with Maine Responds (maineresponds.org).
2/Maine Responds is our state's public health #volunteer network.
Hundreds of your neighbors are using their skills to help the entire state’s #publichealth system.
And it's an impressive, well-oiled machine. Some quick stats 👇🏾
3/Since March 2020, Maine Responds has built a #COVID19 response team of 519 activated #volunteers.
They've donated 38,917 hours during 6,474 shifts.
The #volunteers have carried out 34 distinct missions - both one-time as well as sustained, long-term efforts.
2/It can be hard to digest the data and make sense of the various studies. Thankfully, the @CDCgov is out with a new Science Brief that does just that.
I recommend this Brief for anyone looking for an overview of the current scientific evidence.
1/It's good being back on Twitter. Since being back, I've been thinking about how/why misinformation proliferates so widely on social media like Twitter.
To adapt an old canard, Twitter is a medium because it is neither rare nor well done.
2/These qualities are simultaneously features and bugs. Twitter is ubiquitous and open to everyone, which makes it ideal for disseminating information. But Twitter is also ubiquitous and open to everyone, which makes it ideal for spreading misinformation.
3/The misinformation that concerns me is that which is driven by what I will call "gadflies."
These are individuals who do a bit of "research" on YouTube, or perhaps even via a pre-print, and then find a quote that accords with their pre-conceived notion (confirmation bias).
1/It's time to take stock of where we are w/#COVID19 in Maine from an epidemiological perspective.
Let's start with the big picture. The PCR positivity rate is now 5.3%. One incubation period ago, it was at 4.5%.
2/A portion of that increase is attributable to less PCR testing.
Right now, the current daily PCR testing volume stands at 471/100K people. That's 13% lower than one incubation period ago, leading to a higher positivity rate.
3/Hospitalizations are thankfully lower, but still high. Right now, 166 people are in the hospital in #Maine w/#COVID19. 60 of them are in the ICU and 31 are on ventilators.
Two weeks ago, there were 211 people hospitalized, with 67 in the ICU, though 27 on a ventilator.