A) What about the Client?
There's nothing about the clients existing (or not) backlink profile,
nor is there anything about their current ranking for that term either.
Ranking closely or having no real BLP should make a difference.
>>>
3/9
B) It's not always about SEO!
Links can serve more than Ranking - they can help with awareness, trust/authority, lead generation and conversions.
Consider the potential audiences and possible non-SEO gains of being mentioned and linked!
>>>
4/9
C) Margins and Profit!
Whether it's Direct via the link,
or Indirect due to Ranking gains - money is often the primary goal.
What is that traffic worth?
10% mark-up selling kids toys is Very different to 10% from selling jewellery!
>>>
5/9
D) Not all links are equal!
Chances are a % of those LDRs provide little/no value.
Why count spammy links etc.?
What would you rather have, links from:
500 untrusted LDRs
or
50 authoritative LDRs
?
>>>
6/9
E) Estimates and Unknowns?
So we are looking at a model based on:
* estimated traffic data
* using partial data (G's link DB is a tad larger :D)
* that's missing important client/business data
Does that make anyone aside from me more than a little uncomfortable?
>>>
7/9
Now - I can see the appeal!
Straightforward, simple math - fast answers.
And it is inflated to smooth things off and compensate for things.
But honestly - you need to consider more than "just that" when deciding whether it's worth "acquiring" a link (or ten) :D
>>>
8/9
Personally, I advise to view it as no different than purchasing Ad Space.
You want to know about foot traffic, likely views, what % may take action etc.
If you're attaining a link - they should be able to give you some data (avg. views, avg. clicks etc.)
>>>
9/9
That's on top of any typical "SEO Metrics" you are gauging the link by (and too many pay too much attention to some of those too!).
In short - be smarter and consider the business,
not just the SEO.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've waited a bit for things to die down,
but I think it's time for a little chat about diversity, inclusivity and doing the right thing the right way.
Hey @GoogleAds ... do you want to sort out your staff?
Calling because ads have been suspended,
person refuses to put me through to a manager,
lies saying I've used a profanity,
refuses to give me their reference number,
refuses to give me a call reference number.
I don't think people realise just how long/established the idea of "searcher intent" (or "query intent") is.
We've had several cycles of it over the past decade,
and it's older than that!
More importantly, it's a core aspect of Marketing/Sales.
>>>
>>>
Intent isn't just:
* purpose
* goal
It includes:
* reason
* motivation
Someone may be searching for Pizza.
That may trigger Local, as well as a possible hybrid of Commercial/Informational.
But they are searching for Pizza for a reason (hungry. to bake later etc.).
I keep seeing these things pop-up,
so I thought I'd try to encourage a little thought,
discussion and hopefully improve how this topic tends to be presented.
The typical view:
* Generalists cover multiple subjects (or sub-subjects/aspects) - they have "breadth".
* Specialists have great depth of a singular aspect.
>>>
But people have realised that's not quite right!
So we end up with the "T" - both Breadth and Depth!