A few days ago russia beseeched China to supply it with weapons, ammunition, food and war materiel.

Even if China agrees - it would take a month or more to deliver these supplies and they won't change the war's outcome.

Let me explain:

1/9
It is 5,500 km from the railway crossing at Manzhouli in China to belgorod, where russia operates its main railway hub for the invasion of Ukraine.

russian trains will take a week to cover this distance, but it will take China even longer to get materiel to Manzhouli.

2/9
China's People's Liberation Army has almost no russian equipment in service. China's most modern equipment is all made in China and russia can't use it.

China could give russia older stuff and ammunition, like i.e. BM-21 Grad copies and/or the rockets for it.

3/9
If China decides to supply more complex systems to russia (tanks, IFVs, etc.), then China will have to take them out of its own units, remove classified Chinese tech (i.e. secure comms, targeting systems, etc.), load it onto trains and bring those trains to Manzhouli.

4/9 A Type 99 tank interior
It will take the first trains 7-10 days to arrive at Manzhouli, where the trains have to be unloaded and then reloaded on russian trains as the Chinese railways uses a 1,435 mm gauge, while russia uses a 1,524 mm gauge.

5/9
After about 10+ days the first trains might cross into russia.

Then it's 7-8 days to Belgorod. Another 1-2 days to unload the trains and load the supplies on trucks.

Then those trucks have to enter Ukraine... and we all know what happens to russian supply trucks in Ukraine.
6/9
So even if China supplies ammo, food, and materiel it won't fix russia's logistic problems, as russian logistics suffer from a lack of trucks, drivers, spares, maintenance, and an astounding lack of convoy security.

And there is nothing China or russia can do to fix that.

7/9
And if China supplies more complex systems, then russia will have to re-install the tech China removed, and russia will have to give its troops at least a few days to acclimatize themselves with the new systems (where everything will be labeled in Mandarin).

8/9
And if China should fly in materiel: a transport plane can fly in 0.25% of what a train can transport.

In short: even if China should supply russia with materiel, it will be too little, it will be too late, and it won't change the fact that russia is losing the war.

9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

Mar 21
putin wants to conquer Kyiv, because the "Rus" in russia has actually nothing to do with russia.

A 🧵 about Kyiv:

In 1547 Ivan the Terrible declared himself "Tsar and Grand Duke of all Rus'", stealing his title from the fallen Byzantine Empire (tsar/czar = caesar) and

1/12
"of all Rus'" from the medieval Kievan Rus' empire.

The Kievan Rus', founded in 882 by Vikings travelling down the rivers of Eastern Europe, was the largest state in medieval Europe until its decline in the 12th century.

Look at the map: moscow didn't even exist back then

2/12
In the 11th century Kyiv and Constantinople were the leading capitals in Europe. With a population of 100,000 Kyiv was the 4th largest city on the continent.

In 1011 Byzantine architects began the construction of the Rus' main Cathedral: Saint Sophia of Kyiv

3/12
Read 12 tweets
Mar 20
I was asked for the reason that putin/russia is so hell-bent on conquering Mariupol.

Let me explain. Thread:

Originally putin assumed the invasion would be a cakewalk, allowing for a quick annexation of Donetsk and Luhansk (dark red). Other regions (light red) would then

1/8
have seen "spontaneous" "people's republics" appear, which would have demanded annexation to russia too.

putin would have slowly dismembered Ukraine after fake referendums, leaving a rump Ukraine under a russian-controlled quisling government.

That plan failed.

2/8
putin now understands that Ukrainians hate russia and will fight a decades long insurgency if russia occupies their country.

putin now also realizes that he has too few troops to conquer and occupy the southern and eastern parts of Ukraine he originally planned to annex.

3/8
Read 8 tweets
Mar 20
Thread re. #Belarus:

putin is forcing Belarus to join his failed invasion of Ukraine. putin seems to believe Belarus's military can stop the flow of Western weapons and supplies to Ukraine.

putin is an idiot:
1) Belarus can't
2) Belarus troops will be slaughtered

1/6
The main NATO-Ukraine supply line runs from Rzeszów to Vinnytsia (+ two more secret supply lines).

That line is 220-250 km from Belarus.

If unchallenged russian forces can move at maximum 120 km from their railheads before needing to be resupplied.

2/6
There are only two railways russia could use:

• Brest, Belarus - Kovel, Ukraine
• Pinsk, Belarus - Sarny, Ukraine

Ukrainians are gonna blow both up. Forcing russia to use the railheads in Brest and Pinsk, which are 50 km respectively 30 km from Ukraine

3/6
Read 6 tweets
Mar 5
No,no, no.

Stop arguing for attacking the russian Black Sea Fleet, while it is anchored of Crimea.

Patience.

Ukraine will attack it with every anti-ship missile available once the russians commence their landing operations near Odesa.

Think about it:

1/4
Once those landing ships open their bow doors to let the BTRs into the water, these ships are sitting ducks.

Closing those doors takes time, closing them means abandoning the troops already in the water. Recovering the troops already in the water takes even more time.

2/4
And all of the fleets escort ships: retreating means to abandon the landing ships to be destroyed, remaining near the shore to cover the landing ships means to be easy targets for anti-ship missles.

In short: any russian landing near Odesa is gonna be another putin fiasco.

3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jan 13
A short thread about #Finland 🇫🇮&🇸🇪 #Sweden... and the short time left for them to join #NATO.

1) #Russia is about to invade #Ukraine.
2) This will lead to a massive increase of NATO forces in #Poland, #Estonia, #Latvia, and #Lithuania.

1/5
3) Russia's invasion will also result in #Finland & #Sweden requesting to join #NATO.
4) points 2 & 3 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 for #Russia & Russia will risk everything to prevent these.
5) The easiest way to stop a country from joining NATO is to occupy a part of it.

2/5
6) #Russia's solution is to occupy Sweden's #Gotland.
7) If Russia occupies Gotland then NATO will reject Sweden's bid as accepting it would mean immediate war with Russia.
8) With Sweden's bid rejected #Finland would have to face Russia alone or accept Finlandization again.

3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(