🧵The editorial board’s @nytimes recent piece is appalling. Looks like #russian propaganda, something you do not expect from a renowned media. This thread is about that⬇️
In its new article, @nytimes writes that betting on 🇺🇦 military victory is only "dangerous assumption" & that returning all 🇺🇦territories under 🇺🇦 control is an unrealistic goal. The editorial office is worried that help of 🇺🇸 to 🇺🇦 will lead to protracted, costly & drawn-out war
Talking about costly war is low. It’s like putting price tag on freedom & democracy. For country proud of its democratic achievements this should be obvious!Furthermore might I remind u that protracted war has been going on for 8 years & world chose to pretend it wasn't happening
Now it’s time to face the reality.
#Putin won't stop until he is stopped once & for all. And it can only be done by military means. #Ukraine is doing well. Our brave army is already doing this. We expelled #Russian troops from 5🇺🇦 regions. Yet Russians are continuing their attack
#Putin won't stop until he is stopped once & for all. And it can only be done by military means. #Ukraine is doing well. Our brave army is already doing this. We expelled #Russian troops from 5🇺🇦 regions. Yet Russians are continuing their attack
And #Ukraine won’t succeed without the military support of the US & allies.
And all we ask is to believe in us & continue to provide us with weapons & other assistance so that we can liberate our entire territory region by region.
We can do it, I am absolutely sure of that!
And all we ask is to believe in us & continue to provide us with weapons & other assistance so that we can liberate our entire territory region by region.
We can do it, I am absolutely sure of that!
Yet such publication as in the @nytimes is undermining the anti-Putin coalition, the coalition fighting for democracy and freedom. Surely, this is exactly what #Putin likes.
nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opi…
nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opi…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
