1/ Recently I was writing about the strategic military situation in #Ukraine in context to the analysis of #ScottRitter. Today I want to add some more information. Scott is pointing out some "difficulties" that he sees in the #Russia|n military campaign. I want to name them
2/ and try to explain, why I do not share his concerns. Not because I want to "debunk" something, but I think, Scott is thinking mainly from a military perspective, and that's why it is always not wrong, to add political and economical elements to it. #Russia#Ukraine#Donbass
3/ Scott sees the following issues: 1) There is a army being forged out in central/western #Ukraine and in the #EU states as well. Therefore the #Donbass formations buying time for them to be trained and equipped. 2) #Ukraine will get high amounts of money and be flooded by
4/ equipment, that will kill #Russia|ns and slow them down. 3) #Ukraine|ian airfore is flying tens of sorties a day against #Russia|n troops.
Well, next I'm going to add my assessment about this assumptions.
Forged out army:
I believe certainly, that there are some trainings
5/ happening in #Poland, #Germany and central/western #Ukraine. Nevertheless, I don't believe that they are being done in huge numbers. Not for e.g. combined arms operations but rather for special purposes like stay behind operations, resistance, guerilla warfare and of course
6/ training, how to use the freshly delivered western weapons. Why do I believe it? First of all, because there is no time for this. Second, #Russia would know this very well, if there would be huge number of soldier training. And they would report it. Third, #Russia has air
7/ superiority over #Ukraine. Any training pointed in developing offensive combined arms operations against #Russia|n troops/territories, would be wasted time, money and (human) resources. Since such offensives (as we see daily) would be annihilated in the open filed at the
8/ beginning of it. If "The West" invests, then for hurting #Russia or benefiting itself (#MIC).
Financial support and lend&lease program:
The whole program aims, to replace the arsenals of eastern European countries, that are still from the Soviet Union, with #American ones.
9/ As long as those countries using those Soviet weapons, they spending money to #Russia for either maintenance, spare parts and ammunitions or for licenses for the same. The #US doesn't earn a thing. By scraping those into #Ukraine and force those countries to change to Western
10/ systems, The US achieves a whole new and big market to replenish. Those are barley significant changes on the battlefield. Even though I can't deny, that they sometimes reach the battlefield, to fire one shot. And this shot certainly can or do kill #Russia|ns. #Ukraine
11/ Another positive side effect is, that Western countries getting rid of the old "high tech" weapons, that wasn't maintained any-more an therefore aren't effective any more (#Stinger and #Javelin). No battery charges, not chargeable batteries, explosives old etc. Lend&lease
12/ will replenish those Western stocks with new and (probably) working stuff. Basically all heavy weapon deliveries are strategically useless, since #Ukraine has no air superiority. All comes back to this issue. Nevertheless on the tactical level those weapons can achieve some
13/ one-shot kills, before getting annihilated.
#Ukraine flies still tens of sorties:
I can not comment much on this, since I simply have got NO information, that such things happen. I know, that Ukraine is from time to time fly some machines, to support its army on some
14/ operational or strategic mission (say, destroying troops, that crossing pontoon bridges). Those planes MAY even achieve some hits BUT they always get shot down immediately. And in the worst case scenario #Russia finds out from where they came from and bomb this place as well.
15/ But I will not exclude, that I simply don't get the right information here...
I personally think, to add something to my former analysis, that we are heading to a #Syria scenario. All the points made in my last analysis applies still. Just we need to think, that we will
16/ reach a point, I'm not sure when exactly, when #Ukraine will run out of heavy equipment. Then #Russia will start to steamroll the "Phase 2" objectives, pointed out by myself in the last analysis. The #Ukraine|ian army will retreat to big cities where it will probably fight
17/ with light weapons, and probably hiding behind civilians or in bunkers like #Azovstal. This is the point, that will be reached, when we start talking about "collapsing #Ukraine|ian frontlines and defences".
This can happen right after the #Donbass campaign or later after one
18/ of the following oblasts.
The issue here, of course, is, that the more #Ukraine is losing ground, the more the morale of the people will shrink and therefore the support, for hiding and supporting Ukrainian troops in their towns and cities. Which means in turn, that even
19/ quicker frontline collapses are possible.
We can think of a snowball effect of losing here. If it will be possible for #Russia to bypass and encircle big towns (rest of #Novorossiya isn't that densely populated like #Donbass) then the towns could eventually capitulate after
20/ getting far behind the actual frontlines.
I believe this is a possible scenario of the further #Russia|n military strategy/approach.
If I find the motivation, I'll write a bit, about the operational level of #Russia's campaign.
The tactical level is already widely discussed
21/ on Twitter by many bloggers :)
If you like my thread, please RT.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I want to give an assessment about the state of the war and what I think how it will continue. Moreover I want to address shortly the dispute between #ScottRitter and @GonzaloLira1968.
Eventually I want to add a political dimension to the whole picture. #Ukraine#Russia#Kiev
2/ First of all I want to state, that I do support Scott's assessment about the current state of the operation. Why? There is a special military operation ongoing, whose objective is, to free #Novorossiya, and probably either integrate it into #Russia or establish it as a new
3/ country. Of course, because #Russia is considering #Novorossiya as Russian land, and the people as Russians. Therefore Russia is advancing extremely carefully, to preserve the population, as much as possible. If someone ask the question, how this