⚡️#Sievierodonetsk doesn’t exist anymore. 🇺🇦soldiers started leaving the city in organized manner. It’s not possible to hide and fight effectively there.121 days of incredible and professional defense despite quantity superiority of the enemy. What is important here?1/
1) Army of #Russia can proceed only by complete destruction of the areas. Tactics is simple as “scorched land”. They couldn’t win in terms of tactics and planning. That is why less numerous units were standing firmly against so called “2d army” for more than 4 months. 2/
2) #Ukraine has 3 main goals: keep the land, keep the army and exhaust #Russia’s army up to maximum. Battle for #Sievierodonetsk was more and more about exhausting RU skilled human resources last weeks. And now it is about saving #UAarmy units, who are our main resource. 3/
3) Now battle will be around #Lysychansk. Positions there are incomparable better for #Ukraine, as the city is on the hill. New portions of weapons can make this battle different from one for #Sievierodonetsk. 4/
4) #Sieverodonetsk is an example, how much timely weapons supply matters. Earlier supply of heavy artillery could have significantly changed this 4-months battle. Anyway, skills of 🇺🇦army is proved to be incomparably high to 🇷🇺5/
5) #Sieverodonetsk will be treated by RU propaganda as big victory, of course. But in #Ukraine it is just one more example of heroism and skills. Sometime, you need to step back to save the army. Especially, if city was devastated to rubble by heavy RU bombardments. 6/
6) Another signal: logic of military decision-making prevails over political one. Bcs for political reasons (like #Russia does it) UA authorities could make the army stay at any price on the destroyed areas. It doesn’t take place and that is good for #Ukraine 7/
7) #Ukraine needs to accumulate weapons, save units, and plan counteractions basing on that.
These are our heroes, withdrawing from #Sievierodonetsk. Day by day, with no fear they stood firmly for our land.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maria Zolkina

Maria Zolkina Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mariia_Zolkina

Jun 3
🧵#100daysofwar. They said, #Ukraine would fall in max.3 days, but we surprised the whole world. Maneuvering defense, sophisticated tactics, top-level military skills. Huge motivation and spirit in the army and society. In this 🧵 some major conclusions so far 1/
Military summing up:
1A)#Russia failed in majority of attacks: #Kyiv, Sumy, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, Odesa, Mykolayiv.
1B) RU “success” in major part of #Luhansk region isn’t due to RU offensive, but rather bcs of tactical step back of #UAarmy. 2/
1C) Where UA army seriously fought in Luhansk obl (#Sievierodonetsk, Popasna, Rubizhne), Russians can’t take the towns for 3 months already!
Their only tactics is to destroy city to zero (Popasna, #Rubizhne), to occupy this empty land 3/ #ArmUkraineNow
Read 13 tweets
May 31
Some more thoughts on meaning of RU oil embargo: 1) economic calculations are not the main issue. It is political breakage of “business as usual” with #Russia. The most sensitive area starts being covered by sanctions. Strategic turn from energy dependence is being started. 1/
2) “Steel” schemes appeared to be flexible. #EU changes its politics, business in areas, which were untouchable before. 3) RU isn’t a reliable partner anymore. The sooner this dependence from RU ends, the safer for the EU. This approach slowly, but irreversibly shapes reality 2/
3) #Ukraine will raise its weight in energy (and not only) negotiations, cause southern part of #Druzhba pipeline goes through 🇺🇦 territory to all 3 countries, excluded from ban on oil embargo: #Hungary, #Slovakia and #CzechRepublic. 3/
Read 6 tweets
May 28
This THREAD is for those, who doesn’t know precisely, how myth about “separatism” in #Donbas appeared in 2014. It was invasion of #Russia and occupation with only difference from now – RU troops were without insignia. Here are some numbers on public opinion. #StopRussiaNOW 1/
March 2014. #Russia has already captured administrative buildings in #Luhansk and Donetsk and organized “protests” around them. They already had weapons and first killing of UA activists happened. Meanwhile Ukrainians continued to go out and protest. 2/
In 03/2014 @dem_initiatives made national public opinion poll about possible “separatism”. 89% in Donbas considered UA to be homeland. Both “independence” of #Donbas or its accession to another country were not popular at all. No widespread separatism! dif.org.ua/article/chi-vl… 3/
Read 13 tweets
May 26
🧵#Russia is continuing attack using no sophisticated tactics: just burn everything out using its domination in artillery and air bombardment. Goal is clear: push stronger to prevent some Western states from sending heavy weapons to 🇺🇦 and make them think about negotiations. ⬇️
Now its a turning point for several states: large weapons supply will make UA definitely win. We lack only offensive weapons in needed quantities. Some on the West still have to make final decision: send it and defeat #Russia completely, or not send and use half-measures 2/
The latter mean fear and lack of understanding, what to do with defeated (and collapsing afterwards) #Russia. But half-measures don’t work this time. It’s not 2014. UA military victory now is the only key to predictable regional and Europe-wide security. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Apr 30
Regiment #Azov continues to be absurdly accused of being “neo-nazi/extremists/far-right”. Working with media as an expert I state: journalists in many cases do not dig deep, don’t understand context and use myths about Azov without attempt of fact checking. Here is a 🧵
Where are media often wrong? 1.Biletsky isn’t a leader of Azov. He neither commands it, nor influences commanders. He has no formal relation to regiment, which is part of National Guard of UA. He is leader of party “National corpus”, but commanded Azov only several months in 2014
No, Azov isn’t a military wing of the party “National corpus”. Azov was founded by Biletsky, and he has been benefiting from its image since than. There are personal links btw former and current soldiers of Azov, but that doesn’t mean Azov is guided or commanded from outside.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 25
🧵We should stop weapons supply to #Ukraine, cause the more weapons, the longer war and the more casualties! Risky and manipulative argument, used by loyal to #Russia experts and politicians to stop soppier of UA. Here are several counter arguments to that. 1/
Military counter argument. UA army is efficient in repelling massive offensive. RU had to leave Kyiv, Chernihiv, Sumy and almost all Kharkiv regions. 4 weeks of attacks in Luhansk obl. didn’t bring RU control over main cities, besides of Kreminna. RU occupied there rural areas
Success in repelling RU offensive happened BEFORE massive weapons delivery to UA. Decisions on new massive supplies, including of heavy offensive weapons, started being made on the edge of March-April and continues now.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(