With tensions up, as good a time as any to comment on #China, both the #CCP and #Taiwan. First regarding US Speaker #Pelosi's approach and the CCP sabre rattling, I noted earlier:
For China to dictate the speaker's travel schedule would be unprecedented
and too much weakness even for the #Democrats. For the party politically, canceling the trip would be a lose lose and going a win win. Cancelling the trip would strengthen their reputation for weakness and causing US loss of prestige abroad. They are already set to fare very
poorly in November. Going on the other hand is a win win. If nothing happens (to #Pelosi), she and the Dems get a minor boost for being "strong" or "brave" and the like. If she is hurt or killed, then as I commented the upcoming historical GOP takeover of both houses in November
is threatened. That aside, I have been wanting to comment on the possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan for quite a long time, but time has not permitted. In this thread I will not develop the thought very much, and leave that for future posts, but will note a few key ideas in broad
strokes. Communist China cannot successfully invade Taiwan. Not at this point. Any such attempt would be a massive fiasco, a catastrophe for the CCP and potentially the end of the regime. In future posts, hope to detail why this is the case. The Chinese army is not only a paper
tiger, it is a police army of an autocratic and (semi) communist regime. It is awash with corruption and inexperience. China has fought one true war since the Korean war, one many decades ago (vs Vietnam) in 1979 where it performed poorly and its PLA was badly handled.
Its ranks, from privates to generals, have no experience in combat. Positions & commands are political and training lacking & unrealistic. #Taiwan on the other hand, lives and breathes to defend itself against such an invasion across the straits. We have seen & discussed how
difficult a mere river crossing is from a military standpoint in the current war in Ukraine. Even that of a small river, let alone one the size of the Siverskyi Donets if only at low summer levels. The Taiwan straights are another matter altogether.
Rough seas, volatile weather, the narrowest point 130 km wide. Amphibious operations are among the most complex and difficult to execute for armies. Defending against them among the easiest. #Formosa itself has limited potential landing beaches (~14 spots by some estimates).
Surrounded by coastal wetlands, it is subsequently filled with high mountains, dense jungles and some of the densest urban areas in the world, the Taipei metro area housing nearly 9 million people. Taiwan itself counts on a 23 million strong population that is highly mobilizable,
with many men currently (or recently) in the reserves. The military mainly prepares for this scenario. China lacks the military transport, let alone the coordination to be able cross the channel successfully in the needed force. Any PLA forces that do get to the main island would
immediately be cut off and trapped. In any event, it is my view that currently there is no way for such an operation to succeed, even without immediate Western intervention. The interesting matter is that normally, China would know that. This is why it has never invaded yet.
Normally, China's move would be more nuanced. It could strike the island. It could attempt a naval blockade. It could invade and seize certain smaller islands closer to its mainland. It could intimidate and wear Taiwan down. The game is on the one hand, show how fruitful
cooperation (and ultimately integration) with the economic powerhouse can be, and how painful defiance will be. China can aim at wearing down the will of the Taiwanese people to resist. "Look, it's not so bad in Hong Kong, let us negotiate". Taiwan like every other place has
political disagreements, a left and a right. China can attempt military operations short of invasion combined with economic and political warfare to get to the negotiating table. Once it gets its foot in the door, such as in a "One country, two systems" framework as in Hong Kong,
Taiwan's fate is sealed. Once PLA troops can be stationed in Formosa, even if legally confined to the barracks, China can achieve what it could not with an invasion across the straits. Step by step, it can whittle away the ROC's independence. Having said that, we don't live in
normal times. Generals with power point presentations can convince themselves and the political leadership of almost anything. The West's weakness has never been so apparent. China's economy is showing the cracks, revealing the house of cards that it is. Xi Jinping is under
pressure, aware of the current weakness in the Western world, & an ideologue determined to go down in history as much more than the caretaker in charge of a strange communist/crony capitalist system that can last while everyone has more food and a bigger TV today than yesterday.
All of this means that the CCP could actually order a full scale invasion of Taiwan. It may even hope that the mere attempt, the "shock and awe" of it, can accomplish the wearing down of the population that a more complex long term operation may cause. But as long as
the Taiwanese will to fight is there, this would be a military fiasco for the CCP of historic proportions. In short what remains to be seen is if China knows that it cannot successfully invade Taiwan, regardless of mainstream media hysterics, or if it does not & has believed its
own propaganda. As some readers like to say, gotten high on its own supply (of propaganda). "Yes men", an overload of intelligence information & information in general combined with being disconnected from the reality on the ground & the street can lead to big miscalculations.
We shall see if #XiJinping will miscalculate, or strategically seize the historic moment, during western decline, to further empower the CCP, his rule and his legacy (largely to the detriment of the Chinese citizen). The battle is more likely to be one over the hearts and minds
of the residents of #Formosa. Do they still believe that they truly represent China (&/or wish to be independent), or are they willing to bend the knee for promises of safety and ease. The folks meant to be in their corner, look weaker then ever, their communist foe stronger than
ever, and so the #CCP will bet on their wavering. If the island is still populated with men who don't think life so dear, nor peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery, then the CCP & the PLA have no chance at all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is no doubt that you will find me finding fault with the #Ukrainian regime much more often than with Russia, but I am saddened at what likely was a deliberate strike against Oleksiy Vadaturskyi. Mr. Vadaturskyi was one UA's richest men (a "grain oligarch"), a nationalist
and pro-European. This would put him at odds with Russia politically, but from the limited knowledge I have on the man, he was a formidable & somewhat principled one. Unlike most oligarchs who rose to riches by squabbling for the assets of the state as it privatized by political
infighting Mr. Vadaturskyi was somewhat of a self-made man. From a farming family around Nikolaev, he created Nibulon (w Hungarian & London partners) to develop and profit from UA's agricultural export potential. In 1998 Nibulon received a direct loan of $5 million USD from
The #Ukarinian regime does many things in its desperate fight to remain relevant & in power, but it is often quite predictable. This one I nailed on the head.
The order came all the way from #Zelensky. Forced evacuation of the rest (still UA-held) Donetsk.
"A government decision was made on the mandatory evacuation of the #Donetsk region" he said. Zelensky said hundreds of thousands of people remain in the #Donbas near the fighting and admitted that many refused to leave (they don't mind the Russians coming):
"Many refuse to leave but it still needs to be done, “If you have the opportunity, please talk to those who still remain in the combat zones in Donbas. Please convince them that it is necessary to leave." His motivations were not clear, we only got the absurd statement that:
#Ukraine has repeatedly hit the #Antonivskiy bridge across the Dnieper river in the #Kherson area. This started about July 19 & yesterday saw some of the heaviest strikes, reportedly by HIMARS. The bridge seems to be structurally intact, though closed due to surface damage.
#Ukraine is putting at risk many bridges and dams across the Dnieper. Besides the 3 around Kherson (1 road, 1 rail & 1 road & rail), they are all in UA hands and the entire Ukrainian army in the east depends on them for even the limited supply they are receiving now. We discussed
previously why these bridges had not yet been targeted.
There was a tacit understanding between the parties not to try to strike at these bridges and dams. In preparation for now more modest UA aims, to regain Kherson and the west bank of the river,
The thread being long enough, could not fit all I would have wished. But let me add a last and important point. After the release of this information, we learned of two high level dismissals in the Ukrainian government. #Zelensky fired the First Deputy Secretary of the National
Security and Defense Council Ruslan Demchenko. As part of the Council, which among other tasks coordinates security matters and advises the president, he very well may have been involved in clandestine matters such as this operation. He also worked as deputy minister of foreign
affairs. Perhaps more tellingly Zelensky also fired the commander of Special Operations Forces (SSO), Hryhoriy Halahan. Until 2016 these units were under the Chief Directorate of Intelligence (HUR / GUR), and so are highly correlated with this kind of operation. The SSO includes
Undoubtedly some very interesting developments here. In the immediate aftermath, @bellingcat & its lead #Russia investigator @christogrozev began damage control regarding the announcement. Mr. Grozev claimed that he was not involved in the operation (as RU sources asserted) but
simply had a front-row seat as a film-maker (for a documentary). He also denied that the Ukrainian operation was a failure or a Russian coup. He portrays it as a mutual attempt at playing the other side, in which the UA came out on top and RU FSB blundered & revealed important
), calling it a "blunder for the FSB, disclosing unintentionally identities of dozens of counter intel officers, their methods of operation, and their undercover assets.".
Reports emerging that #Ukraine, apparently believing itself to be 1960's Israel, and #Russia 1960's Iraq, (not to mention Russian pilots to be Christian Assyrians in Iraq), tried to recruit #Russian pilots to defect with their planes (ie SU-24 / 34). The failed UA intelligence
operation was busted and "flipped" by a successful Russian FSB counter-intelligence operation. The UA intelligence agents were reportedly lured to identify themselves, other trusted sources, and UA anti-aircraft systems details & positions. A defecting pilot for example would
reasonably need to know many such details in order to fly over Ukrainian territory with a reasonable assurance of not being shot down and killed. This was a creative idea, one I could see coming form the likes of #Arestovych or other Ukrainian well read in history, specifically,