JP Kleinhans Profile picture
Sep 1, 2022 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
OK, so we just finished our 3-paper series on the #EUChipsAct.

The 3. paper assesses the effectiveness of the proposed #Crisis Response Toolbox.

stiftung-nv.de/en/publication…

We see many, many problems. Here's why... 🧵

#semiconductors #chips #chipshortage #Europe Image
The proposal talks about utilizing common purchasing, export restrictions and priority-rated orders during future chip shortages to ensure security of supply for Europe.

We also added national reserves since several countries (Spain, Japan...) are thinking about those.
Let's walk through the value chain, shall we?

Chips:
None of the tools are effective when applied to individual chips because semiconductors are...
- highly customized/not substitutable
- end-products (cars...) need ~1000 chips from all over the world
Front-/Back-end fabs (priority-rated orders):
- it takes 4-6 months to make a chip
- other orders would need to be rescheduled, that takes also time
- Many shortages were due to lack of chemicals/substrates. What is an EU fab supposed to do when chemicals are missing?
Equipment:
- good luck trying to use common purchasing for EUV steppers🙄 same goes for national reserves.
- Using export restrictions on EU equipment? Great, you still need all the missing equipment from US/JP!

Pissing off your allies in a transnational value chain - bad idea.
Chemicals/Wafers:
- On paper, common purchasing/nat reserves COULD work for chemicals but is it worth it?
- export restriction: same headaches as with equipment. EU fabs rely on chemicals from JP/US/TW, if everybody starts using export restr. the next shortage will be MUCH worse.
Bottom Line:
The #EUChipsAct's Crisis response toolbox will be of little help during a future chip shortage and will potentially do a lot of collateral damage!

Well, what should govts do instead? Great question! (read the paper!)
Flaw in the #EUChipsAct Pillar 3:
They do not talk about responsibilities of end-customer industries (cars, telco, health, consumer, etc)!

In many areas the #ChipShortages were due to poor purchasing and bad supply chain management (#JustInTime) by end-customers of chips.
If you don't create incentives for those industries to establish better, more resilient supply chains (multiple sources, overstocks, etc) not much will change during the next shortage. Nothing has been learned.
Lastly, if you are currently working on the #EUChipsAct I'd highly recommend you (at least) skim through our paper series. We pretty much dissected Pillar 3. You might disgree with our assessments, totally fine, but there is A LOT to fix in the proposal!
Links to all of our #EUChipsAct analysis.

Why gov't supply chain monitoring is a bad idea.
stiftung-nv.de/de/publication…

Why/How gov't should get smart on the global value chain.
stiftung-nv.de/de/publikation…

Why it's about crisis prevention, not crisis response.
stiftung-nv.de/de/publikation…
Thanks! Read the papers, it's worth it. Promise. 🙏

Cheers. ❤️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JP Kleinhans

JP Kleinhans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JPKleinhans

Dec 8, 2021
Good news everybody!

The excellent @J_B_C16 and I teamed up (again!) to analyze what #China's rise in #semiconductors means for #EU. It's not 60 pages and 300 references like the last one (sorry).

Reading this are 20min well spent, promise!

stiftung-nv.de/en/node/3187 Image
This is the second paper based on our (@snv_berlin) cooperation with @merics_eu to make a deep dive into #China's #semiconductor ecosystem. The first paper assessed China's competitiveness in #chips and can be found here. stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/… (it's a "long-read").
In today's paper we distilled several #policy recommendations for the #EU in great expectation of the upcoming #EUChipsAct, future conversations at the EU-US Trade and Technology Council (#TTC) and in light of EU's #IndoPacific strategy.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 30, 2021
Good news everybody!

To enrich your summer break John (@J_B_C16) and I wrote about #semiconductors and #China!

We analyzed the global semi value chain across three strategic dimensions: industry competitiveness, #NationalSecurity and #resilience

cc @snv_berlin @merics_eu /1 Image
First, we looked at the generic production steps - consisting of 3 process steps and 5 inputs.

For each we analyzed barriers to entry, market concentration, competitiveness of Chinese industry, Chinese policies, etc. Image
Based on that we then assessed each production step across 3 'strategic dimensions'.

Idea: What motivates a government to invest in/support its semi ecosystem or cooperate with allies?

Can we systematize that / come up with a framework for 'national interest'? Yes, we can! Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 5, 2020
Why don't we talk about the 𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗧𝗦 of replacing #Huawei gear in EU?

Both @BTGroup and @VodafoneGroup talked about it in their latest financial reports to investors.

theguardian.com/business/2020/…

Let's have a look... [THREAD]
The BT Group estimated in their latest financial statement that the UK's 5G requirements will have "an impact of around £500 million over the next 5 years."

btplc.com/Sharesandperfo…
This got widely reported without putting it in context. Let's put that "£500 million over 5 years" in context:

BT Group's Capital Expenditure per year (ONLY network investments):
2017 = £1650 million
2018 = £1728 million
2019 = £2083 million

btplc.com/Sharesandperfo…
Read 10 tweets
Jan 29, 2020
So, #EU #5G #toolbox is out.
ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/d…

IMHO, excellent work. Seriously.

What becomes crystal clear, though: 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝘂𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲, 𝗔 𝗟𝗢𝗧. In the future they will have to... [Thread]
+ continuously assess the risk of deploying particular 5G network equipment and restrict/prohibit if necessary. (p20)

+ audit MNOs at an "in-depth technical level" (p20)

+ assess operators' sourcing strategy and the involvement of 3rd party suppliers (p20)
+ assess to what extent an operator implemented baseline technical network security measures (p20)

+ "perform rigorous assessments of the risk profile of all relevant suppliers at national level" (p21)

+ assess/restrict whether MNOs rely on Managed Service Providers (p21)
Read 7 tweets
Jan 14, 2020
There is a relatively new #5G report from @OxfordEconomics analyzing economic impact (losses) of banning #Huawei in different countries: resources.oxfordeconomics.com/hubfs/Huawei_5…
Their math might be right but several of their assumptions are flawed and ill-informed. [THREAD]
Assumption: RAN Market shares will remain the same over the next 10 YEARS. If Huawei is restricted, operators have to choose between Nokia or Ericsson since smaller vendors don't have "the same global reach or breadth of products and services [...] to successfully compete". p14
Why this is flawed: #5G is all about #virtualization virtualization, software defined radio (#SDR) networks. This creates a HUGE opportunity for new players to enter the market and the report completely ignores this development even though it's happening as we speak. Examples...
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(