2) Opponents of designation claim listing the IRGC would punish draftees who are conscripted to IRGC and have “no choice” but to complete their compulsory service. They argue listing IRGC, which would bar IRGC members from entering Europe, would unfairly punish conscripts.
3) However, the very premise of this argument is based on a flawed understanding of the recruitment and drafting mechanism that the IRGC uses for Iranian conscripts. This process is in fact far more nuanced and requires attention. Let’s take a look 👇
4) Firstly, identifying & distinguishing between IRGC members & conscripts is straightforward. IRGC members do not receive their “end of military service” card—a legal document—until they retire. Conscripts receive this card after completing their compulsory military service.
5) In Iran, it’s compulsory for all healthy men above 19 to complete a 2-year military service. Out of Iran’s annual intake of some 400,000 conscripts, only 50,000 are drafted into the IRGC. But the IRGC is extremely selective re its 50k intake of conscripts. Here’s why👇
6) After 1997, Khamenei restructured & increased indoctrination in IRGC with the goal of nurturing more extremist and ideologically pure future generations. He again doubled down on this goal post-2009 unrest—resulting in indoctrination making up 50% of overall training in IRGC.
7) This goal had direct implications for IRGC’s conscript intake. To prevent outsiders from diluting the ideological commitment of other recruits, in 2010 IRGC instituted a new system for evaluation & appointment that sought to restrict conscript intake to active Basij members
8) Since 2010 more than 70% of draftees in the IRGC have been active members of the Basij. In Iran’s major cities, where demand for IRGC military services is higher than elsewhere, this has even reached 100% of draftees. washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysi…
9) So, since 2010, we know that at least 70% of the IRGC’s 50,000 conscripts are ideologically aligned to the Guard as they were already proactively affiliated via the Basij, which operates as the IRGC’s voluntary civil militia. institute.global/policy/irgc-ag…
10) But what does this mean for the remaining 30% of the conscript intake? Are they just ordinary Iranians who have unluckily been deployed to IRGC? The answer to this is more nuanced than “yes” or “no.”
The intake from this remaining 30% can be broken down into 2 categories 👇
11) The first are university graduates with a master’s or Ph.D. Due to their postgrad degrees and subject-matter specialties, these draftees complete their 2-year service by applying for desk jobs through directives (amriyeh) from different ministries and agencies.
12) Each draftee has a personal choice on where to apply for their amriyeh. These include the health ministry, the industry ministry, and the defense ministry and the IRGC’s affiliated organizations (cultural, political, economic).
13) Those who serve their amriyeh in the IRGC will have made the proactive decision to work for the IRGC during their 2 years of conscription in spite of its reputation. We can conclude these individuals may have ideological convictions that align with the IRGC & its objectives
14) Determining whether an individual served his amriyeh in the IRGC is achievable through the relevant documentation, incl official letter of amriyeh + pay slips. These individuals will have an official letter from IRGC & will have been on the IRGC’s payroll for 2-years.
15) Finally, in some unprivileged areas, due to insufficient Basij numbers, the IRGC also accepts non-Basij soldiers. Of IRGC’s 50,000 conscripts, these individuals constitute maximum 20% of the intake.
16) While filtering and determining this category would require a special degree of scrutiny, it can be achieved on a case-by-case basis. They will have no amriyeh documents & almost all will have only a high school diploma or below.
17) The case for proscribing the IRGC as a terrorist organization is clear & compelling. The IRGC is a violent, Islamist extremist organisation that operates no differently to listed groups in the UK and EU: from ISIS and AQ to Hezbollah. @InstituteGCinstitute.global/policy/making-…
18) For +43 years, the modus operandi of the IRGC has been—and remains—terrorism, militancy, hostage-takings, and hijackings. It has been involved in terrorist operations against civilians—inside and outside Iran—and has created some of the deadliest terrorist groups in the world
19) The rise in IRGC terrorist activity across Europe, coupled with its increasing propaganda presence—designed to nurture homegrown radicalization in Europe in a way not too dissimilar to the Islamic State—has added urgency to proscribing the Guard. unherd.com/2023/01/irans-…
20) Listing IRGC as a terror org would give EU member states & UK a clear mandate to ban activities & content associated with IRGC + increase safeguarding measures to prevent against homegrown IRGC and Shia radicalization—something not currently covered by existing IRGC sanctions
21) Through the above mechanisms, Western states & international community more broadly will be able to ensure that ordinary Iranian conscripts are not targeted. In sum, conscription in the IRGC should not be a barrier to listing it as a terrorist org. foreignpolicy.com/2023/01/30/ira…
1) The UK must proscribe the IRGC as a terrorist organisation now
Our new paper makes a clear case for proscription: from exposing IRGC indoctrination material to tracking the rising threat of homegrown Islamist radicalisation in Europe 👇 #IRGCterroristsinstitute.global/policy/making-…
2) Correctly defining IRGC is key to proscription. It’s not a conventional state army. Rather it can most accurately be defined as
an ideological organisation. It began as an Islamist militia & has maintained its militia identity through the way it operates today. I explain👇
3) IRGC ideology is violent, Islamist extremist. IRGC indoctrination to radicalise members calls for jihad against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians, & torture/kill Iranians opposed to regime. IRGC uses the same Quranic verses as ISIS to give religious legitimacy for such practices
1) What’s happening inside #Iran should not be surprising. It’s been clear for years that the Iranian people want regime change. But like Ukraine, the West was misled by so-called "experts", who made everything about JCPOA & Trump.
Here's what they've not told you👇
2) State & society gap in Iran has been increasing for years. Since early 90s, Iran’s society has experienced process of secularisation/liberalisation. Today, this has reached unprecedented levels. Polling reveals 68% Iranians want secular state, only 32% identify as Shia Muslim
3) Dissent has manifested itself on the streets. The pattern of unrest in Iran shows anti-regime protests are getting larger in size, scale & regime violence:
1)#Iran’s Foreign Ministry reporting that Raab spoke with Zarif ahead of this week’s #JCPOA talks in Vienna
Iran’s MFA reports Raab told Zarif “London will do its best to help negotiations bear fruit”.But #UK’s changing posture toward Iran should noted
Reflections on UK-JCPOA👇
2) Two weeks ago, the #UK published its Integrated Review (IR) – the biggest review of UK defence, security & foreign policy since cold war - where it outlined overarching international policy objectives until 2030.
Rising concerns about #Iran’s regime featured throughout 👇
3)The most noteworthy change in relation to #Iran policy was the absence of any reference to JCPOA.
Since 2015, the #UK has explicitly defined its Iran policy through the #JCPOA & its commitment to upholding it. So the absence of any mention of the JCPOA in the IR is important
2) Last week’s explosion in #Beirut has put significant pressure on #Iran’s activities in Lebanon, which are carried out by #Hezbollah –a Shia Islamist militia Iran’s IRGC helped create in 80s to export Islamic Revolution to #Lebanon & destroy the “Zionist regime”(#Israel)
3)Hezbollah's been 1 of Iran’s most valuable assets. Together with IRGC it's undertaken Iran’s strategic/ideological goals via terrorism, hostage-takings,assassinations, Syria + it's entrenched itself in political institutions.For Hez actions @Levitt_Mattwashingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysi…
1)The #IRGC is eyeing Iran’s presidency & Parviz Fattah is emerging as its perfect candidate
As a strong contender for 2021, Fattah has been dominating headlines
But who is Fattah? What's his ideology? What would his presidency mean for #Iran’s domestic/foreign policy?
THREAD
2)Despite avoiding limelight, Fattah’s got lots of experience:Ahmadinejad’s energy minister (1st term) + heading Khamenei’s ideological-charitable orgs:Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation (2015-19)& Mostazafan Foundation(current role).But underpinning all of this are his ties to IRGC
3)Fattah’s a product of the #IRGC. His career began on the frontline of #Iran-Iraq War, but his links extend beyond the battlefield. After leaving gov in 2009, he became dep commander of IRGC’s construction HQ, Khatam al-Anbia & head of its investment arm,Bonyad-e Taavon-e Sepah