This thread is intended as a "mini literature review" on arrhythmias after COVID vaccine versus COVID - there are people claiming that heart block is a serious, worldwide risk after COVID immunization. Lets see what the actual research says. #COVID19#mRNA#VaccinesWork
There are in general fast heart rhythms and slow ones - the technical words are tachyarrhythmia and bradyarrhythmia. Both can cause dizziness and sometimes life threatening problems, but lets go through them systematically, using only peer reviewed literature to think through.
TLDR#1: In contrast to the myocarditis risk being skewed towards old boys/ young men, the risk difference of having an arrhythmia after COVID is much worse, than that equivalent risk after COVID vaccine and this risk persists at all ages.
TLDR#2: It is possible to be empathetic to those who experienced an adverse event after 💉 that was a heart rhythm problem, while refraining from misrepresenting the research to them. Don't listen to those who extract maximum possible fear from myocarditis.@VPrasadMDMPH
Now, the details. The heart rhythm system is a bunch of specialized cells that are buried in the heart muscle which control the muscle cells by delivering electricity (the same flavor as the one in your house just a lot lot tinier).
We measure the electricity by a thing called an EKG, which is basically a fancy medical voltmeter but much, much more sensitive (to pick up tiny voltages).
Electricity is normally invisible to the unaided eye but if you could put on magic goggles it would look something like this (this video is actually filming calcium ions moving around) . youtube.com/shorts/zdBgxIp…
The reason slow heart rhythms can occasionally be problematic is because if you are missing heartbeats enough of the time, they can make you pass out (in the most severe circumstances). Blood flow can also be disrupted if the heart moves too fast (atrial fibrillation/ flutter).
I am happy to acknowledge the existence of case studies of serious slow heart rhythms after COVID vaccination, but to actually determine a rate, epidemiological studies are needed. The most helpful study is the one done by @UniofOxford on population level rates of arrhythmias.
The main article focuses on myocarditis but it also does have a very nicely done section in the supplemental tables focusing on the types of arrhythmias observed pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34907393/ .
Point 1: The total rate of arrhythmia across the whole population studied is unambiguously higher after COVID illness (bottom row) than the risk after vaccination with either the Pfizer or Moderna or ChAdOx1 vaccines (upper rows).
Point 2: Those who hype vaccine myocarditis love to leave out table 4 in figure 2 - which shows the risk of all cause arrhythmias after COVID diagnosis is much higher than that same risk after immunization. They like to emphasize the first 3 but not #4.
Point 3: We can see what those actual arrhythmias are; they consist of both the slow and the fast. Here's a table with some key data points from the supplemental tables:
The accompanying table shows the risk associated with heart blocks (the heart blocks are divided into smaller time periods). The risk of slow heart rhythm spikes early after your COVID infection and gradually goes down, but is larger than than same risk with immunizations.
Even in those people < 40 years of age, the risk of arrhythmia in COVID disease exceeds the arrhythmia risk in COVID vaccination. The risk difference according to this really well done paper is not subtle. A legit further direction of research...
is to see if the risk of arrhythmia is different with Omicron variants (meaning did the risk of COVID arrhythmia change over time from 2020-2023); studies on this question are sparse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One part of his presentation focuses on statins, and the controversy surrounding his project with Abramson/ Malhotra et al about the risk/ benefit ratio of statins. As a quick recap, statins are intended to lower cholesterol, and Malhotra's position is that...
as many people as possible should stop their statins and focus on exercise. This narrative is as usual based upon distortions of the evidence, and normal cardiologists don't need to distort the evidence to make their point.
#COVID19#VaccinesWork It is actually possible to be empathetic to the vaccine injured while refraining from misleading the public - Again, Aseem Malhotra has fallen short of this standard when he spoke in @GibraltarGov . Here's how he recycled more of his distortions.
He still thinks that the abstract provided by Gundry at the @AHAScience / @American_Heart is adequate to prove that mRNA is causing widespread undetected coronary inflammation... no that is not accurate. sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-puls-test-… . That test is not validated for this purpose.
He still believes that mRNA vaccines cause widespread accelerated coronary atherosclerosis... an experiment is necessary to show this. The most frequently cited piece of evidence is the untimely death of @KailashChandOBE ; while it was tragic it is insufficient evidence.
1. Natural immunity works for those who get it. Those who are deceased, aren't here to defend themselves anymore. Those who are still struggling with #LongCovid#LongCovidKids , are still struggling. Many of those who recovered from COVID, are still dealing with...
significant cardiovascular risks replicated across several studies and study methodologies erictopol.substack.com/p/heart-attack… . A GOP and @gbdeclaration bent on minimizing COVID isn't doing enough to help with this side of things.
#vaccines#VaccinesWork#COVID19@DrEliDavid is doing a bunch of threads to remind the world on what healthcare workers did "in the name of science". It's my turn to remind those who think like him, what the antivaxxers did in the name of **their science**.
People with no medical knowledge were thoroughly convinced that ICUs were harming them with no evidence. Some of the people who left ICUs died at home, of preventable deaths.
#heart#transplant#covid19#vaccination There is a great deal of consternation about heart transplants and vaccine requirements. This thread is meant to explain to the public why our partners in heart transplant are so incredibly strict.
Heart transplant is one of the most scarce resources that exist. Big reason? A donor has to be deceased for a heart to be available. Even then, a separate medical team has to be sure the heart is healthy enough survive two surgeries (leaving the donor, getting to destination).
If fully functional hearts could be delivered at some point in the far future on a 3d printer, this will no longer be an issue. That’s an active area of research but not a reality.
#debate#science#COVID19 Scientific issues are not settled by "debate hall" style debate like you see at the Oxford Common... they never have been, despite the pleas of far right wing media platforms. Political debates are their own ecosystem.
Science debates are settled by making better and better experiments and getting researchers to iron out issues systematically . Brian Greene is an example of someone who actually did the homework...
to achieve the expertise to scientifically debate someone outside his own field. The Twitter spaces of @IanCopeland5 are another example of someone actually systematically bringing the science to bear on current events regarding COVID and holding bad arguments accountable.