In affect this would mean all future campaigns are full fledged criminal enterprises with carte blanche to use all criminal means at their disposal in order to steal the Presidency. If you win, can’t prosecute the President. If you lose, can’t prosecute the loser. #VeryStupid
This argument is odd in another way. So in order to in order to avoid becoming a third world dictatorship we need to avoid the equal application of the law? Having circumstance and individual status dictate prosecution is supposedly necessary to maintain our democracy? #Nuts
This is a common tactic of the left. It’s a linguistic construct designed to limit options and force their desired outcome. Remember the “fiscal cliff”? I mean who intentionally goes off a cliff? Problem they have is Trump is a linguistic master and won’t be trapped.
Let’s be real, in the last debate when Trump was supposedly behind he made a promise to the electorate that he would investigate Hillary’s crimes. Nothing was more third world Obama admin corruption. You could argue it’s why America elected Trump.
So although they are attempting to set a linguistic trap it’s unlikely to work because it’s fundamentally weak on the facts and they dealing with a very different political creature in Trump. A linguistic master.
Remember what happened in that debate? Hillary tried setting a linguistic trap structured around temperament. She had been setting up this moment for months and in one second Trump slipped the trap.
“Because you’d be in jail!”
“Because you’d be in jail!”
Long story short, Hillary’s and Obama’s time is coming and no “third world” linguistic BS is going to stop it...
please unroll
