News moves quickly, and two new motions hit the docket this morning: one from prosecutors and another by Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti.
More developments when the hearing starts in about 10 minutes.
Background: courthousenews.com/thursday-heari…
Government's letter motion (6 pages)
documentcloud.org/documents/4447…
Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti's memo supporting a motion to intervene (103 pages!)
dropbox.com/s/xw5kiu41niku…
Judge Wood takes the stand. The attorneys introduce themselves.
Government will provide the hard copy documents by tomorrow.
Blackberries take longer to extract, prosecutor says.
He added that iPhone was also seized which also takes time.
Everything has been "forensically processed," McKay said.
"Everything has been working just as we represented to the court since our last visit."
Judge Wood: "The letters that I received for counsel for Mr. Cohen and the intervenors has convinced me that" this process can go quickly with a special master.
Wood: That's my understanding.
Prosecutor McKay objects. He wants briefing on the matter.
McKay is not asking for a denial - just a chance to review Avenatti's motion.
Avenatti is now up, sharing his privilege concerns.
Davidson was Stormy's prior attorney.
Wood says that she doesn't see any flaw with Avenatti's proposal.
Wood: I will hold off on a ruling on Mr. Avenatti's motion to intervene.
Wood: Initially, I would defer to the special master.
But the judge invites the parties to share their proposals.
He says that Barbara Jones is a "wonderful choice."
"The filter team takes its job very seriously" and wants to make "informed objections," McKay said.
Wood offers a hypothetical of coming across a file about a child's medical file showing a broken ankle.
That'd be clearly unresponsive.
Cohen's lawyer: They've got all this stuff that's not in the warrant and they want to look at it.
Wood: I don't think so.
If Jones selects keywords that she deems non-responsive, McKay warns, some files may fall through the cracks.
"It's dramatically expanding the scope of what she's trying to do," he says.
Cohen's lawyer: Yes.
"The concern is one of attorney-client privilege," he says, adding that it's a "very serious expansion" of the special master's scope.
McKay: "I haven't had the chance to read Mr. Avenatti's" motion, which is more than 100 pages and was filed minutes before the hearing.
More updates and analysis coming up soon.
The professor noted why Judge Wood would be inclined to appoint a special master.
courthousenews.com/thursday-heari…