Reading Ms. Spampinato's Tumblr-worthy anti-male diatribe, a few thoughts occur to me. @RationalMale theguardian.com/books/2018/jun…
First, of course, it the "Atrocity Narrative" pretext: A man does terrible thing, thereby authorizing the feminist to write quite generally about ubiquitous male evil. @RationalMale
Second, the feminist never describes males in any context other than in discussing violence, abuse, misogyny, etc. If a man ever did any good thing in human history, no feminist has ever mentioned it. @RationalMale
Third, the fixated obsession with male power. Any influence, status or authority in society is wrong, if a male possesses it. Feminists believe it is wrong for a male to have power, ever. @RationalMale
What men tend to notice about women is their beauty. But if feminists were taken to be representative of women in general, then the only thing women ever notice about men is their power (or lack thereof). @RationalMale
This feminist obsession with power is something I can't comprehend or relate to. Never have I craved power over others. All I desire is independence. But feminists seem as power-mad as Pol Pot. It's frightening. @RationalMale
What distinguishes true leaders is not their appetite for power, but rather their sense of duty. One doesn't think of Eisenhower, for example, as a man of ruthless ambition, and Patton craved glory, but not power. @RationalMale
