Only if you take the absolute best case scenario...which is literally impossible.
Funny how many liberals are ignoring the other scenarios the study presented...which are far more likely, and..more costly.
This is grossly disingenuous interpretation of the study as written.
Funny how many liberals are ignoring the other scenarios the study presented...which are far more likely, and..more costly.
This is grossly disingenuous interpretation of the study as written.
Nobody...and I mean NOBODY...believes we could provide payment rates at Medicare rates across the board, and maintain current services.
Literally nobody.
So why are people lying about this scenario being possible?
Literally nobody.
So why are people lying about this scenario being possible?
I've posted multiple threads worth reading on this today...here is another.
Are progressives really arguing you could cut payment rates 30%...and still maintain current services...for 10% more people at the same time?
REALLY?
Are progressives really arguing you could cut payment rates 30%...and still maintain current services...for 10% more people at the same time?
REALLY?
The funny part about this?
@mercatus was doing this in good faith. They were giving the benefit of the doubt that people would look at the spectrum of potentialities to see the range of costs.
But progressives only latched on to the most ridiculous scenario possible.
@mercatus was doing this in good faith. They were giving the benefit of the doubt that people would look at the spectrum of potentialities to see the range of costs.
But progressives only latched on to the most ridiculous scenario possible.
