Profile picture
Dan McLaughlin @baseballcrank
, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
It's not exactly "recanting" to change your position on something you had no personal knowledge of in the first place, but still clarifying on the Jim Jordan story:

dispatch.com/news/20180809/…
My general sense has been that both Jordan's critics & defenders are overselling their case, when the real debate is woulda coulda shoulda arguments - about responsibility and attentiveness - from circumstantial evidence that are unlikely to be resolved with smoking guns.
Put another way, the Jim Jordan story is never gonna be "he knew A, B, C, and D" vs "he did not know A, B, C, or D." It was always gonna be "he knew A and B, he should have troubled himself to learn C and D." But that's not as sexy a slogan.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Dan McLaughlin
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!