Here's what went down:
A spate of armed robberies hit at least nine locations in Portland, Maine, in March.
The government orders Google to find all users who were within 2 of 9 locations, covering a total of 45 hectares...
Over the coming months, Google just doesn't respond with the data. It doesn't appear to file any response at all, in fact.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
The feds appear to just give up waiting on Google.
Earlier this month, a suspect pleads guilty and the FBI reveals it used multiple other surveillance methods to catch him.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
Amazingly, a discarded Under Armour shoe finds its way into the FBI's hands. They match the DNA on the shoe to the DNA of the suspect.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
And they get toll records for the suspect's work van.
Ultimately, they didn't even need the Google data but put in their request anyway.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
BUT 2 of the locations were less than 500m apart.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
The FBI is getting judges to sign off on warrants that allow them to get Google user information, including names, addresses and location, without even knowing who they're looking for across wide areas of land.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
The FBI thinks it has a right to that info, even if innocents' data gets harvested too.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
It's completely unclear how they prevent innocent people getting caught out.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
And here's that AP report on Google location tracking ICYMI: apnews.com/828aefab64d441…