In case you're new to the field, IP and cyberlaw are very different. And this list scarcely captures the latter. Two main reasons: (1) who is considered cyberlaw here is arbitrary and (2) the impact of cyberlaw extends to other disciplines, i.e., well beyond law reviews.
Take @daniellecitron. She is *core* cyberlaw. But she's listed as writing in a related field. 🤔 Apparently she has 545 Sisk citations since 2013. Impressive. Until you run her Google Scholar citations, which include books and (gasp!) journals in other disciplines. Then it's 2093
Part of the problem is that, despite its indisputable centrality to contemporary life, the legal academy still doesn't *get* law and technology. And a big reason for that imo is that we lack a common methodology. If we self-identified as law and tech, maybe this wouldn't happen.
(Sorry for the rant. I'm finishing up a book proposal on law and technology so it's top of mind.)
