People can write all the threads they want defending Kavanaugh’s testimony but it doesn’t change the basic facts:
1. He testified Manny Miranda never sent any materials prepared by Dem staff and he did
2. He testified that he wasn’t involved in Pryor’s nomination and he was
1. He testified Manny Miranda never sent any materials prepared by Dem staff and he did
2. He testified that he wasn’t involved in Pryor’s nomination and he was
3. Kavanaugh testified he didn’t find out about the warrantless wiretapping program until 2005 and he was writing emails about it in 2001
The defenses of Kavanaugh aren’t really defenses, they are excuses
The errors were inadvertent or immaterial
The defenses of Kavanaugh aren’t really defenses, they are excuses
The errors were inadvertent or immaterial
Well, the errors aren’t inadvertent when, after you are presented with documentary evidence showing the error, you repeat it again
And lying to Congress isn’t immaterial, it’s a crime
And lying to Congress isn’t immaterial, it’s a crime
