Thread by @1FreeInhabitant

1) Uniform Commercial Code

This woman has it *almost* right... Let me take a moment to analyze her assumptions and conclusion. It's a tweet, granted, but the essence is there...

UCC... What is it, really? Is it to fear?

https://twitter.com/AnaLuciaAlves_/status/1037865581783994368

2) It's true. The UCC is indeed—in some sense—to blame for much of the mess in which we find ourselves. The UCC is the codified version of the old Law Merchant, which itself has its roots in the Rolls of Oleron (lex mercantoria), Rodian Sea Law (lex rhodia), and Justinian Code.

3) But what is it? Well, it covers quite a bit, but it's basically all about secured transactions. At the end of the day, there needs to be a mechanism in law that handles this kind of thing. Let's look at a simple example...

4) UCC is NOT the law of contracts, but it is tied at the hip in most cases. If there is a transaction, and you're dealing with UCC, there must be contract for this transaction. It's also not property law, but again, tied at the hip in most cases.

5) UCC is basically the final arbiter of ownership or lien position... It's fairly basic law. The code is well-written and doesn't make use of "words of art," as in Admiralty Law. It's based on TRUTH.

Yes, the old Law Merchant is a codified truth mechanism—honor among thieves?

6) Let's assume Ana and I have an agreement... She agrees to teach me yoga over the internet, in exchange for my help in building & designing her new website.

Under the "laws of nature and nature's God," we could do this exchange in one of two ways.

1) Barter
2) Contract

7) Ana, as I understand her position, is in favor of NOT using the UCC for trade. Fine. Under common law, we could make a simple exchange. It's STILL a contract... even if verbal and without the intent of bringing in the State.

8) What happens if i design her website, present it to her, and she is not happy with it... In fact, she says she doesn't want to do the deal anymore. What recourse do I have at this point? There was no written contract. It only matters if I seek remedy.

9) Do you see how this friendly, non-governmental trade agreement, in the private, could get out of hand quickly, because of a feeling of inequity?

We were just chillin' and talking about yoga..

If there is a contract, the law follows the letter and intent of the contract.

10) Well, even though I delivered a design she didn't like, I still provided CONSIDERATION, and she did not... Normally, I'd ask for partial payment, or some other compromise... But this time is different. I've already been shafted by the previous 3 clients, and I decide to act.

11) What choice do I have? There is no written contract, and no witnesses... How can I seek remedy?

I could take this to court (admiralty) and try my luck there... Might win, but the decision is in the hands of an administrator (judge), with a VAST range of judicial slack.

12) No thanks... Admiralty is mired in words of art, and color of law... I'll operate in it, but only with a contract. The contract IS THE LAW in such cases, which forces the judge to follow the letter of the law (the contract).

13) We could decide to settle this with arbitration, but let's assume she is not cooperating, and just wants me to get lost... What other recourse do i have for remedy.

UCC

14) First, to remain in honor, I send a simple notice to her via certified mail, politely asking her to make the payment based on our verbal agreement.

You MUST send the notice, or you will not be in honor of your brother... (sister in this case).

15) This notice must be The Exact Truth of what occurred, based on my first-hand knowledge, including my supporting documentation (few emails, let's say). I am writing under penalty of perjury, so NO LIES... It's literally Biblical... It's honor.

16) Guess what? No need for a court... Nothing to do with "courts." Courts are for civilized commercial warfare. It's an affidavit before God, and is solely by Verdicts of Juries (upon hearing first-hand knowledge-based evidence) and by unrebutted Statements of Truth.

17) It's called Notice of First And Final Warning.

18) If Ana does not respond, point by point, then the unrebutted points stand as Truth in Law. Being the Truth, in Law, it immediately becomes The Judgement, in Law. And that's were you provide an affidavit of obligation and an opportunity to cure...

19) If she does not respond (30 days), I record a commercial lien with a UCC-1 financing statement, which allows me to—in essence—use that lien as money.

I have been made under law, and she will not be able to operate in commerce until that lien is satisfied.

20) No judge, no attorney. No President. etc.. can mess with it. It's none of their business because it's not in a municipal or a territorial jurisdiction... It's a statement in truth to God. And I have my remedy. Commerce flows, and all is right in the world.

21) As a wise businessman, I should have, instead, created a contract with my own terms... True, a yoga website is a bit overkill for UCC, but this kind of disagreement happens all the time at the bank levels... Same childish stuff, but with fancier words.

22) As for Ana's contention that we should REVOKE, RESCIND & REDACT contracts, what she means are the invisible contracts you have with your government, because you didn't correct your standing in law.

She is right... But WORDS matter in law... None of those will work.

23) The word she is looking for is called VOID. In law, the only mechanism that obliterates a contract as though it never existed is when there is fraud. If fraud exists, that contract is VOID AB INITIO... from the beginning... And man, oh man, has there been fraud.

24) So, let me take artistic license and fix her comment, because I'm certainly not picking on her, but i couldn't help but want to tweak a few things... I didn't ask for permission on this, so, at best, it will just be my opinion...

Here is the fix...

25) Once humankind awakens to the fraud that has been perpetrated upon the People, we will learn to contract when we choose to contract, and with whom. We will void all contracts made in fraud, and will use UCC for justice in commerce, so that we may receive remedy under law.

26) Thanks Ana! I couldn't resist.

Laws aren't bad... needed, in fact. They've just been used by very bad people as a tool to confuse us, and profit from our ignorance for their own nefarious gain.

UCC can be QUITE a powerful tool for FREEZING assets... Bad guys fear it.

/ end

27) Me and my darn addendum: Ok... The bad guy here isn't any body of law. Well, maybe canon law has some weird shenanigans going on with words, but I digress... I love UCC. I even like Admiralty... Why? Because it functionary. It serves a necessary purpose—Commerce. Life. Cycle.

28) Want to know who the real bad guy in this whole picture is? The nasty truth... Wait for it...

The whole entire effing legal system. Not the law.

The Temple Bar in the City of London is both Bank and Court, and they use words and ceremony rooted in the occult.

The System!

29) And the sick way they've twisted English over the centuries—with every new edition—always 3 steps ahead of us sheep, comes their tricks. They got to choose the translation of the KJV Bible (Church and court), AND the DICTIONARY!

On the whims of this inner cabal of priests.

30) And any reasonable person of integrity might shout, "This isn't fair! We just won't have this in our country!" As would any righteous man... "This is not British!"

And then they find out that the City of London was never in THEIR country (UK). It's sovereign.

Spooooky...

31) And... So to politely give the middle finger to the LEGAL system, we merely bypass the BS—robes and all—say, "Ello, sirs... Kiss my bum. Righy then... "

And we talk directly to the perpetrator, under God, with UCC (common law), and we call that crook out... Into the light...

32) No Black Magic mirrors or layers of obfuscation and word-smithing...

Plain English. UCC.

Sorry... I had too much coffee... End.