I am happy that you began your answer with 'IF'. Did RMAFC approve ALL their earnings? I doubt.
Secondly, even if it is approved by the RMAFC, it does not automatically make it right: a thing may be legally okay but morally/ethically questionable.
Secondly, even if it is approved by the RMAFC, it does not automatically make it right: a thing may be legally okay but morally/ethically questionable.
Can RMAFC, for eg, decide to allocate the entire recurrent in a budget as the senators' take home pay?
Of course, no.
The developmental impact of political office holders is very important.
It is unconscionable that our legislators' pay is about 50 times 🇳🇬's GDP per capita.
Of course, no.
The developmental impact of political office holders is very important.
It is unconscionable that our legislators' pay is about 50 times 🇳🇬's GDP per capita.
Thirdly, apart from the fact that some ethical issues can in certain circumstances surround the earnings of CEOs of PRIVATE entities, there is a big difference bw private funds & public funds.
Legislators paid from public funds CANNOT compete with those paid from 'private' fund.
Legislators paid from public funds CANNOT compete with those paid from 'private' fund.
*The developmental impact of the pay of political office holders is very important.
