Profile picture
George Watts @autgeek
, 11 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
I think any way you try to split autism into subtypes it only creates more barriers for autistic people to overcome. If services are aimed at type A they have to prove they are A enough and not too B to access them. It becomes easier to exclude them.
I often quote this tweet which I feel captures how this applies in functioning labels language
But I'm disturbed by an increasing number of people talking about the 'female phenotype' of autism. I don't think there's male autism and female autism, I think there's autism and so far we are only good at recognising how it tends to look in males.
I like to call this the extreme male bias and talk about it afflicting professionals wherever they interact with autistic people 🙃
'Female autism' essentialises the lesser researched aspects of the autistic experience and again puts up barriers for people e.g.:
I was talking to someone recently who works on an autism charity helpline and she said they have plenty of initiatives aimed at supporting autistic girls now but she dreads the calls from the parents of boys as there's nothing she can offer. This is unfair.
Female autism also perpetuates the idea that gender is a binary and people have to be either male or female but surely by now we know that (especially for autistic people) gender identity is far more complex than that?
Too many non-males fit the 'female profile' for it to be truly female! And that's an ok thing, I don't think saying this stuff also applies to other people should be seen as a threat to feminism...
Autistic women and girls are prejudiced against because they are female, others are also prejudiced against because of their gender identities and for many other reasons, we don't need to play most afflicted top trumps.
I see autism as a unified whole not divided into subtypes. Sure there's many co-occurring conditions which are seen alongside autism and many autistic traits can also be stand alone conditions but I'm not convinced the complexity means we need to carve it up into bitesized pieces
I'm mostly thinking aloud here, other perspectives most welcome!
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to George Watts
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!