Who else got this weird email claiming to have contradicting information on @TabletMag's story on the Women's March but requiring an off-the-record agreement to share any of it? I've never seen anything quite like this before. 
@tabletmag This is very unusual. I don't understand why they want me to go off the record if they have some sort of contradicting information. Heck, I didn't even write the piece. I didn't even tweet about it. I retweeted others who tweeted about it.
@tabletmag This is the weirdest attempt at damage control I've ever seen. If you have information that supposedly clears your client then you should share it publicly instead of trying to go off-the-record with every reporter who tweeted (or even RTed) the story. It makes no sense.
@tabletmag They also claim the original Tablet story is being corrected but there aren't any corrections or notes on the story so I'm very skeptical of that claim. Here is the story so you can see for yourself: tabletmag.com/jewish-news-an…
@tabletmag Judging from my mentions, they sent this email out to quite a lot of people...
@tabletmag For transparency's sake, here is how I responded to the PR firm's email.
@tabletmag They have yet to respond to me. I'm not holding my breath...
@tabletmag And the parody emails have begun.
@tabletmag I couldn't agree to the first because I'm in the tank for Bobcat/Smug 2020. I obviously agreed to the second because I'll do anything for the Goldblums.
@tabletmag The Megaphone Strategies rep responded to my original email. She said they wanted the fact check to be off-the-record because it includes "individual text messages and private conversations." That doesn't explain the demand for deleting tweets.
