Thread by @OnWithLogic

1) Yeah, but TRUST BARR? Or is Barr the target of the Scaramucci model? Is Q indicating Whitaker returns as AG? Was the acting label a test run to see what he does in the position? is Barr just bait? #QAnon

2) This post seems to suggest that DECLAS will be used as a means to smoke out those that don't want dark to light.

There is a blockade around DECLAS. A combination of "muh ongoing investigations" and "muh allies," meanwhile the gears fermenting civil unrest continue. #QAnon

3) Think of the scope of this drop. We go from feeding North Koreans thru aid, down to Bruce Orh finally being fired from the DOJ.

This should give us a clear line into the level of corruption at play...

4)... that an idiot simpleton at the DOJ named Bruce Ohr and the United States government's foreign aid policy to North Korea to provide food aid can be interwoven. #QAnon

5) This is a quite complex Q post. Lots to digest. For the moment, I am back to where I end up every time: C_A. They, on the behalf of the invisible hand, are controlling who becomes the American President, and North Korea. #QAnon

6) Q is indicating the scope of the control: it is so deep that it penetrates low level sycophants like Ohr to geopolitical gamesmanship using NK to trigger WW3.

This just strengthens my view that these intel agency armies are so much larger than we ever imagined. #QAnon

7) Go back to post #1.

In @POTUS's position, do you simply have to assume EVERYONE is C_A or a foreign intel asset until you can prove otherwise? Dunno. Something to consider in the face of not even being able to determine if RR is a white or black hat, or Mueller. #QAnon