,
31 tweets,
12 min read
Read on Twitter
@youngscrap Nah. Let’s ask ourselves a few questions: Do we really want to watch a one-sided propaganda hit-piece with two know extortionists, liars, opportunists, and perjurers fabricating tales of pedophilia? I mean who’s in to that other that a certain breed of person? If Michael...
@youngscrap Jackson, the same guy with a notable super IQ, and the business acumen to buy the ATV/Beatles catalog, would allow Wade Robson to be the FIRST star witness to testify in 2005 trial on behalf of Michael’s innocence had he been touching Wade’s little wee? Hell no!...
@youngscrap Prepare yourself. You are in for a treat. The only reason why anyone would believe these current claims is because of the previous extortion attempts and because he settled the 93’ case against him... but it wasn’t a criminal case. And even after he settled, the Chandler...
@youngscrap family could have still sought a criminal trial against MJ, but didn’t. Why? Because they got what they wanted. Money. I don’t know about you, but if someone molested my kid, I would want justice! If I can debunk the old claims, against Michael, the new ones have no validity...
@youngscrap What A LOT of people forget or don’t know, including MJ Fans, is that California’s statue of limitations allowed the ‘93 settlement and “evidence” in the 2005 trial. Jordie was conveniently out of the country. Jordie’s mom testified in the trial where Tom Mesereau ripped...
@youngscrap her apart. We learned in that 2005 trial that she hadn’t even spoken to her son for 11 years up to that point. We also learned that Jordie emancipated himself from his parents and had he showed up, Tom Mesereau had 7 witnesses on standby to testify how Jordy admitted...
@youngscrap to them that his parents forced him to lie, which is why he emancipated himself from them. Then there is a lesser known 2 million dollar settlement about tickling that was allowed to enter the 2005 trial as well. The accuser actually did show up to that trial and...
@youngscrap again was ripped the fuck apart and told 4 different stories in less than an hour while on the stand. Judge Melville even considered charging the accuser right then and there with perjury!
@youngscrap Michael never wanted to settle this cases, but because of bad legal advice, he did. Keep in mind that 2 grand juries twice dismissed the Chandler’s criminal case before Michael settled. Now, put yourself in Michael’s shoes for 2 minutes...
@youngscrap You’re the biggest star the world has ever known. You are also an extremely private and shy person. You have this vindictive DA doing what they can to make shit stick to the wall. The DA orders pictures taken of your naked body, including your genitalia, and you comply...
@youngscrap As much as you don’t want to settle, the bad legal advice start to sound appealing now that you know everyone is going to see your naked body of a trial was had. So you take the bad advice. Speaking of Michael’s penis, the accuser described it as being much smaller...
@youngscrap Than Michael’s flaccid penis and was described as being circumcised, which was also untrue. The 2005 trial was just bullshit to begin with. Nothing about it was true and the media wasn’t allowed to report positive things on Michael so the only thing the public heard was...
@youngscrap The prosecution’s lies. In the actual courtroom, Tom Mesereau was killing the prosecution but none of that was reported. Gavin Arvizo and his family were just lying and during testimony, caught in many of their lies...
@youngscrap On verdict day when “Not Guilty” was read 14 consecutive times vindicating MJ of ALL charges, that “Not Guilty,” completely exonerated Michael Jackson for the Jordie settlement, the “tickling” settlement, and Gavin Arvizo’s fabrications!
@youngscrap So without the original claims in the picture, as they have been debunked by the FBI and due process, that leaves us with Wade Robson and Jimmy Safechuck. At this point the only 2 people in the world that Michael Jackson supposedly molested. Let’s dissect these clowns...
@youngscrap In 2011, Robson approached John Branca, co-executor of the Michael Jackson Estate, about directing the new Michael Jackson/Cirque du Soleil production, ONE. Robson admitted he wanted the job “badly,” but the Estate ultimately chose someone else for the position.
@youngscrap In 2012, Robson had a nervous breakdown, triggered, he said, by an obsessive quest for success. His career, in his own words, began to “crumble.”
@youngscrap That same year, with Robson’s career, finances, and marriage in peril, he began shopping a book that claimed he was sexually abused by Michael Jackson. No publisher picked it up.
@youngscrap In 2013, Robson filed a civil lawsuit/creditor’s claim, along with James Safechuck, who also spent time with Jackson in the late ‘80s. Safechuck claimed he only realized he may have been abused when Robson filed his lawsuit. That lawsuit was dismissed by a probate court in 2017.
@youngscrap In 2019, the Sundance Film Festival premiered a documentary based entirely on Robson and Safechuck’s allegations. While the documentary is obviously emotionally disturbing given the content, it presents no new evidence or witnesses. The film’s director, Dan Reed, acknowledged
@youngscrap wanting to interview other key figures because it might complicate or compromise the story he wanted to tell. But what is that story you ask? This film mimics the contents of a (US-banned) fictitious book by a sickening child abuse fantasist
The film contains eerily similar...
The film contains eerily similar...
@youngscrap claims that convicted criminal Victor Gutierrez is reported to have made in a book in 1993. In this book, he claimed that the Jordie, from the ‘93 case, and the King of Pop were lovers. Michael Jackson sued and WON!
@youngscrap Gutierrez lost and was ordered to pay Jackson $2.7m in damages. Gutierrez fled the country and filed for bankruptcy.
@youngscrap So, armed with all of this knowledge and truth, I implore each and every one of you to NOT watch HBO’s fictional film that they are trying to pass as a “documentary” titled "Leaving Neverland.” While for some it is tempting to lump Michael Jackson in the same conversation...
@youngscrap with R. Kelly and Cosby, I am here to tell you all to stop that shit right now. The allegations surrounding Mike largely faded over the past decade for a reason: unlike the Cosby or Kelly cases, the more people looked into the Jackson allegations, the more he was vindicated.
@youngscrap No fan of Michael Jackson is here to support the abuse of children! Many are parents themselves and as a collective they would not excuse abuse because they “like the music” or they “like the way he danced.” The facts are clear, MJ was NOT a child molester.
@youngscrap So after 26 years, a 10 year secret investigation by the FBI, which was released under the Freedom of Information Act, countless departmental investigations and two legal acquittals, MJ is on the stand once again, except this time one created by social media!
@youngscrap Ultimately we are given two options: we can believe our intelligence agencies and due process, or we can believe two proven liars, extortionists, and opportunists.
@youngscrap Believe in due process. believe in our intelligence agencies. Believe that facts don’t lie, people do. In this case, those people are Wade Robson and Jimmy Safechuck! Ask yourselves if this film would exist if Michael was alive? The answer is a resounding “no!” Why? Because...
@youngscrap there are currently no laws protecting the deceased from defamation. That includes me, you, and Michael Jackson. Just think, these two perjurers could have been looking dead in the camera and telling the same lies about YOU!
