,
6 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
@darwins_apostle shares work about epistemological disagreement with a detailed analysis of science classrooms, focused on argumentation. #NARST2019
@darwins_apostle: Overemphasis on argumentation can eclipse other parts of the NGSS standards that support students' sensemaking. #NARST2019
@darwins_apostle: uses knowledge in pieces to think about teacher thinking. That means that the researchers don’t assume stability in epistemological stance. #NARST2019
@darwins_apostle: One teacher shows a commitment to being expansive about what is in an argument, but also shows a commitment to drawing a clear boundary about what is evidence. #NARST2019
@darwins_apostle: Other teacher self-identifies as a "purist" about argumentation, who does not show a commitment to being expansive about what is in an argument. #NARST2019
@darwins_apostle: This tension is reflected in the NGSS standards as well. #NARST2019
