,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Cool, cool. I agree, of course! Some followup Qs, @HowardSchultz:
1. What precisely does the Constitution say about the use of midazolam and hydromorphone to administer the death penalty?
(thread)
1. What precisely does the Constitution say about the use of midazolam and hydromorphone to administer the death penalty?
(thread)
@HowardSchultz 2. What is the impact of the Second Amendment on the right of individuals to posses non-military personal firearms, in the context of Constitution art. 1, § 8, clause 15, art. II, § 2, clause 1, and the limitation on standing army funding found in art. I, § 8, clause 12?
@HowardSchultz 3. The Constitution nowhere expressly mentions the power of courts to strike down unconstitutional laws. Would you please elucidate Marbury v Madison in the context of the right of privacy identified by SCOTUS, not forgetting to discuss Griswold v. CT and Obergefell v. Hodges?
@HowardSchultz Because you see, sir, I agree completely with you that the Constitution should be upheld. I'm hoping these simple Qs will help you elucidate your sophisticated views further and advance your ambition to serve as a wise and thoughtful president.
Sincerely,
Your friend,
Scott
Sincerely,
Your friend,
Scott
