If they do, it is only a matter of time before people leave it.
Monasticism is a prime example.
Their interpretation of asceticism (Zuhd) meant a complete detachment from the world.
Children who forsook their parents to become monks were held in high regard.
St Anthony had never, until old age, been guilty of washing his face.
St Macarius of Alexandria slept 6 months in a marsh, exposing his body to the stings of venomous flies.
A lot more examples exist from the monastic movement in Europe.
Did all that counteract the promiscuous and material lifestyle of the Romans? No. Because it was a lifestyle that contradicted human nature.
The Islamic perspective is different. The Arabians were both chivalrous & warlike in temperament. The Prophet ﷺdidn’t attempt to tone it down, rather it was channeled differently.
He ﷺ wove the characteristics of the Arabs in to the fabric of Islam.
Ibn Taymiyyah said “man agrees to give up a thing only when he is provided with a substitute thereof” (Iqtidā’-us-Sirāt-il-Mustaqīm)
At first, it was accepted as a result of rejecting the pre-Christian Roman lifestyle.
This applies to other societies as well, such as communism and their denial of a Deity worthy of worship, etc.