,
6 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
I honestly had no idea @AlderLaneeggs was such a dandy. Always thought of him as kinda a tough guy. Apparently not. I usually agree w his ideas. Guess he just doesnt like hearing the other side of the trade...which is silly for any serious investor. Never attacked him to be clear 
Whats funniest about this:
1) I respectfully disagreed with him on 1 idea. My god!
2) It’s obvious @AlderLaneeggs relies entirely on @AureliusValue for this idea – he hasn’t done his own work (check all his $HIIQ-related tweets) & see my next tweet below
$HIIQ
1) I respectfully disagreed with him on 1 idea. My god!
2) It’s obvious @AlderLaneeggs relies entirely on @AureliusValue for this idea – he hasn’t done his own work (check all his $HIIQ-related tweets) & see my next tweet below
$HIIQ
3) What little he does put out as his original “research” is sometimes 100% wrong! And @AlderLaneeggs yesterday was specifically bragging about reading $HIIQ proxies! (This is from the 2018 proxy, and was in the ’17 as well)
And as a side note, @AlderLaneeggs relying entirely on @AureliusValue on $HIIQ is very dangerous (and I've reviewed ALL of what @AureliusValue has published on the name). More on this topic (@Aurelius's $HIIQ research) will be coming...
Final irony here I just realized. @AlderLaneeggs has been pumping $OSTK a consensus short w SI at similar sky-high levels to $HIIQ & he's battling the shorts there while it continually hits new lows. Yet my doing same with $HIIQ is a blockable offense according to this nancy-boy?
@threadreaderapp unroll
