At its core, the argument is absurd. It amounts to a declaration that Trump is beyond accountability entirely.
My new piece:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Emmet Flood claims Mueller had no right to say Trump is *not* exonerated.
But Flood doesn't address *why* Mueller did this -- because he couldn't indict.
The resulting construction is an absurdity that puts Trump beyond accountability:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Mueller declined to make the call on Trump's criminality out of an *abundance of fairness to Trump.*
Now the White House and Emmet Flood are exploiting that in a way that's saturated in bad faith:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Here's an interesting question: What happens if Mueller testifies to Congress, and he's asked why he declined to exonerate Trump?
Here's one possibility:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…