,
4 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Once—just once—I would like to see an atheist PROVE their claim that “the existence of God has never been proven.”
All the mean is “I personally am not convinced.” But who honestly gives a fuck about that? An appeal to personal incredulity refutes zero demonstrations.
All the mean is “I personally am not convinced.” But who honestly gives a fuck about that? An appeal to personal incredulity refutes zero demonstrations.
To do so, they would have to demonstrate they even comprehend the various demonstrations of God—none of the “new atheists” do—and then show them to be INVALID or to involve a FALSE PREMISE.
None have ever even come close.
None have ever even come close.
The only way to “refute” the argument from sufficient reason, as far as I can tell, is to reject reason. That’s kind of an answer to a proof, to deny proofs of anything are even possible. But it’s not a good answer.
You haven’t really undermined a proof if you claim “we don’t need to follow this logical chain to God. We can stop at any arbitrary point and say ‘it just happened, magically, FOR NO REASON.”
