, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
What's weird abt this (where to start) is that if we take @JuliaEAinsley's explanation on its face, this document appears to be an answer to a question that no one was really asking. And to the extent it is that answer, a plain reading of the document suggests ...
2/ a different conclusion than what she says the SCO was trying to convey. The argument that Mueller and Barr were consistent can be made with a highly circuitous and strained argument. But a plain reading of what Barr says suggests he got a clear question and at best gave a ...
3/ highly misleading answer.

None of this makes sense. Frankly, even the document doesn't really look formatted like something I'd expect to see from the SCO.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Josh Marshall
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!