,
10 tweets,
6 min read
Read on Twitter
Missing from @mehdirhasan 's essay on "Why All The Arguments Against Impeachment Are BS" is any mention of what he wants Trump to be impeached for; his argument for why there's a case for it; and anything that "rebuts and debunks" the counter-arguments. Seems important.
LOL: 
For a guy who brands himself as a confrontational, adversarial journalist, @mehdirhasan sure faces some challenges about being challenged himself.
This motivates me to ask: from now on, pls send me @mehdirhasan tweets that you think I should respond to. I'm personally interested in challenging those who declare themselves adversarial but ultimately cater to permissible bounds of dissent within the establishment spectrum.
What @mehdirhasan calls my "weird need to shill for Trump" is code for me challenging the discredited Trump-Russia conspiracy theory. His animosity towards that speaks, I think, to a weird need to shill for the failed media & political elites behind it.
()
()
And BTW, if your video is called "Why All The Arguments Against Impeachment Are BS", why not actually address "The Arguments Against Impeachment", and then make a case For Impeachment? Impeachment is serious business, not just something we say to feel good about ourselves.
If someone could ask @mehdirhasan how I’ve “lied about” him. He can’t answer that question honestly, because his claim is false (in other words, he’s lying about me).
Speaking of lying: Mehdi knows that A) he's misrepresenting me -- I simply asked him to make his "case for impeachment" ().
B) He also knows that I've advocated challenging Trump on his ACTUAL crimes, not a conspiracy theory: ()
B) He also knows that I've advocated challenging Trump on his ACTUAL crimes, not a conspiracy theory: ()
And this gets to why @mehdirhasan has a problem w/ those of us on the actual left: we challenge Trump based on his actual policies, not within the confines of permissible dissent dictated by the Democratic Party, CNN, and MSNBC.
Since @mehdirhasan blocked me, it's harder to catch his falsehoods. Here he claims I "don't operate in good faith." Compare his description (pic 1) to the actual tweet of mine he claims to be describing (pic 2). When he says I don't operate in good faith, he's projecting.
