The point of a technical course is to end up competent at a skilled job. Too many courses miss the mark. Rather than an end assessment set by employers, students do a bit of coursework, some work experience & are told that's a technical course. It's not.
We rely on FE colleges competing to raise standards. Wrong. There is no market in the world where low margins, high capital costs & competition leads to quality. Why? Because only a fool invests in capital equipment if the upside is uncertain and v small.
Colleges need more money. Imagine if your local school could only afford 15 hours a week per student (incl help with Maths & English). Standard practice in colleges. Why is Europe beating us at technical education? Partly because their students learn all week.
In the Netherlands, colleges have 3 years to get a student competent for a skilled job, we give our colleges 2 years & whack them if someone fails to complete a course. The result? Students do easier courses than they need to, leaving under skilled & poorly paid.
We have some brilliant leaders and governors. Genuinely amazing. But not enough. Colleges are complex - too complex - to run. Plus they face extreme challenges with a board of entirely voluntary trustees.