, 4 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
It takes a brave non-lawyer to disagree mildly, let alone strongly, with a legal interpretation by the country's top lawyers.

Disagree is not the same as dislike.
Johnson now complains about people frustrating Brexit. Is that admission of the motive of the prorogation (that turns out not to have been a prorogation)?

#bbcwato
Now @SteveBakerHW also (1) "disagreeing" with the unanimous legal interpretation of 11 Supreme Court judges, and (2) linking prorogation to the attempt to thwart Brexit.

#bbcwato
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Peter Ungphakorn
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!