Thread by @VolutionDe

I`m a climate denier. I don`t drink the cool aid and I don`t believe the bull coming from the IPCC. I get pissed at these climate zealots who claim that any science or scientist or researcher who makes any claims....

..against the established orthodoxy in a publication or web page that is deemed to be a conspiratorial cannot be considered as credible as they all seem to be funded by big oil or the Koch brothers. They have the credentials ....

(think Judith Curry or Dr. Tim Ball) but are still vilified by the climate lobby. I had a drawn out discussion on another well known social media platform that started out with this.. "Scientific community taking IPCC to task...
theepochtimes.com/in-letter-to-u…

In short order, the main antagonist in this story made his expected appearance......
"What would it take to convince you that climate change is a thing?"
Now I did not want this to turn into a full blown climate argument so I answered back..

"Sorry Kyle, can't convince me. See, I was brought up in a different time when schools were not indoctrination centers and we actually learned to think and question instead of just rejurtitating what we had been fed. And sorry, does not pass the smell test especially when the..

IPCC has done it's best to shut down any science that it does not sanction. Science is settled? 97% consensus? Science is never settled, new research is always part of the scientific method, and when science is based on agenda, it's not science, it's propaganda. Remember, we are

talking Trillions in wealth transfer... So don't debate me on this any longer not present me with your fake agenda driven news or research. You will not change my mind. Believe what you wish. I just posted the article for information. End of discussion....

I really wanted that to be the end but noooo.....
He came back, "Isnt being willing to change your mind also part of the scientific method though? It is as important as a peer review.
Lol. We both think that the climate narrative is regarding preventing a transfer of wealth, ..

..my bet is that it is the countries and companies with a large vested interest in not losing their power and wealth perverting science, and you think it is the scientists perverting science.
There is no "big enviro" while there clearly is a "big oil".

Another acolyte joined the conversation..."Scientists that have a vested interest in funding, batshit crazy hippies and kids and if it is science surely threes a quantifiable dollar amount to fix this "problem" if it is even fixable. Or is it an excuse to force beliefs and laws..

.. on others while taking those peoples money ?"

At this point, I had to jump back in. Funny thing...I know I should leave things where they lay sometimes but I know the hypocrisy of the entire climate scam and, to be honest..

I get pretty fucking pissed when confronting climate idiots. Now I start to feel like libtard at times like these cause dammit, I know I am fucking right about this and your not listening to me so it is time for some destruction!!

So I answer back to my antagonist, ignoring the acolyte...
"When are you going to get it? It`s about the money....Yeah, it`s about the money....
Figueres is no stranger to controversial statements when it comes to climate change."

"This UN official has previously described the goal of the UNFCC as “a complete transformation of the economic structure of the world.”" And I posted this:

And then I posted this....
zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-1…

And this: investors.com/politics/edito…

And this: threadreaderapp.com/thread/1129100…

And this: business.financialpost.com/opinion/lawren…

And this...
"More corrupted science.."
humansarefree.com/2016/04/top-sc…

And as a finale, or so I thought....
wattsupwiththat.com/2019/04/15/vic…

But buddy wasn`t giving up......
"Who has the money? Green peace? Or suncor? Halliburton or David Suzuki?
Follow the money. Lol.
This is the exact same as nicotine lobby buying pro-smoking science, and coca cola buying sugar safe science. Established money and ....

..established industry fund fringe studies that cannot stand up to peer review in an attempt to sway public opinion.
Oil already has the money and they will fight to protect their industry."
Then he says.....

..."You say you are a critical thinker, but you are too focused on pennies to see the bags or money.
Or you simply don't want to. Because the change will be to hard to handle."

Now if you noticed earlier, he called me a goof....

Where I come from, calling a male a goof is just about the worst insult you can throw at someone...🤬

Now I`m pissed....
So I focused on my keyboard and plotted my strategy....

I wrote "Where does the money pledged to the fight against climate change go Kyle? Who accounts for it? If you say it is all about the oil companies protecting their turf you have a very narrow focus you fucking goof. Go back to the video of Christine Figuera, or did you even