,
6 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
I highly suggest reading the whistleblower's account firsthand and then taking in commentary when you are finished (this is very much the historian in me saying this but it's a hell of a document) intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
It is a straight up lie that the allegations in the complaint are separate from the memo of the call, as Rep. Turner said. Again, I suggest everyone read the complaint so they have a working knowledge of this stuff from the source.
It's WILD to me that Republicans are trying to go after the credibility of the complaint when we've all seen the memo of the call and the complaint, and they match. I assume they hope most of the public will hear their question rather than reading the documents for themselves.
Hello, me, again. Listening to Rep. Ratcliffe, it's clear the GOP is counting on people to not actually read these documents on their own. Here's the memo summarizing the phone call: drive.google.com/file/d/1uyWKAG…. Here's the whistleblower's complaint: intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
What I learned during this House hearing is that everyone should take the, maybe, 30 minutes it would take to read these documents.
(I'll stop now)
(I'll stop now)
Oh! And here's the link to the Intelligence Community Inspector General's letter to Maguire on August 26 regarding the whistleblower's complaint: intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
