In responding to @SidneyPowell1 motion to show cause & compel production of Brady material, Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack hints that @GenFlynn cooperation agreement req. turning over any comms sent to Flynn by ppl trying to help his defense, including from Congress
THREAD
THREAD
For no substantive reason other than as a veiled warning to back off, Van Grack includes an email sent by Devin Nunes HPSCI staffer Derek Harvey via Barbara Ledeen to Flynn, which Flynn’s prior defense team immediately turned over to the gov (& it appears not for the first time) 
This aligns with Flynn’s defense team also turning over the voicemail from Trump’s WH lawyer Dowd to Mueller, which Team Mueller then misrepresented and truncated to remove context when producing the transcript in the Mueller report
The rest of gov response:
—Powell/Flynn requests are a “fishing expedition”
—SCOTUS allows the gov to withhold impeachment evidence in a guilty plea scenario (*true)
—Powell made up her mind before knowing the facts of case
—Judge should dismiss motion, move to sentencing Flynn
—Powell/Flynn requests are a “fishing expedition”
—SCOTUS allows the gov to withhold impeachment evidence in a guilty plea scenario (*true)
—Powell made up her mind before knowing the facts of case
—Judge should dismiss motion, move to sentencing Flynn
Full response, courtesy of @Techno_Fog: scribd.com/document/42828…
I should say, other than the snark, the rest of the government response is quite strong in many areas (particularly narrowing the scope of the dispute to the single 1001 charge and citing Flynn’s repeated knowing waiver of rights) and I think could be persuasive to Judge Sullivan
