womensliberationfront.org/for-being-tran… "the Harris case was not intended to be about determining the legal merit of sex-based dress codes. It could have been, and in that event WoLF would have made a thoughtful and careful decision about how, if at all, to weigh in on that question."
"You could just read what the very sharp, anti-feminist lawyers at the porn-loving, prostitution-loving, actual-Nazi-defending, ACLU said about this case.
“The Court of Appeals expressly did not address the lawfulness of sex-specific dress codes.”"
“The Court of Appeals expressly did not address the lawfulness of sex-specific dress codes.”"
"This case is about whether or not “being transgender” is synonymous with the right of a man to say he’s a woman, or a woman to say she’s a man, and forcing others to act and speak as though this were true."
" From page 15 of the Sixth Circuit’s decision.."we ask whether Stephens would have been fired if Stephens had been a woman who sought to comply with the women’s dress code. The answer quite obviously is no....
...This, in and of itself, confirms that Stephens’s sex impermissibly affected Rost’s decision to fire Stephens..discrimination “because of sex” inherently includes discrimination against employees because of a change in their sex.”...
...It’s okay to have a women’s dress code, therefore, so long as men who say they’re women have the “right” to wear the same clothing their female colleagues are forced to wear..in the view of the Sixth Circuit, it’s okay to have gender so long as men can benefit from it."
"it isn’t discrimination as a general rule to tell men they can’t “dress like women,” unless the man claims to have a womanly “gender identity.” What on earth would women have to say in order to insist that we don’t want to dress “like women” either, whatever that means?...
...Apparently, to escape that particular form of sex-stereotyping we have to say that we’re men. This is some nonsense.
Human beings can’t change sex. "
Human beings can’t change sex. "
"In the UK, multiple publications cover gender critical and radical feminist concerns, or professionals’ concerns about children’s welfare, on a weekly basis now. Nothing like that applies to the US...
...The main point is that our media here, except for the conservative press..will largely not address the urgent and growing medical experimentation scandal that is child transition...
...We have over 50 pediatric gender clinics in the US, and we don’t have any centralized information on what they’re doing, such as one might be able to request from the NHS...
...detransitioned young women have also been told they mustn’t ever talk to the ‘scary’ conservatives at the Alliance Defending Freedom, who would actually help them...
...Having lost their “transgender” friends, they now must fear to lose their left-loyalist friends if they speak with probably the only lawyers in the country who will not be frightened away from working on their behalf...
...Meanwhile, the HRC..is going to be swimming in pro bono assistance from 6 of the US’ top law firms to..make sure that our 50+ pediatric gender clinics are full of patients to experiment on..and ensure that the severest reprisals will be taken against anyone who tries to fight"
"Shall we spend another few years arguing in obscurity about who’s more problematic, or can we get a little help doing something to stop this barbaric assault on the bodies of children, and the sorts of political speech rights that are necessary to stand against it?...
...it’s someday going to look cowardly and parochial to have done nothing to stop this because one was squeamish about standing next to Christians....
...It also seems that it would confirm all of conservatives’ worst stereotypes about us if we were not moved by conscience to take action in line with our own description of the gravity of the situation."
