1/ Just take a second and consider this in the timeline of events we now know.
As of the first week in August DOJ and the WH were aware of a complaint regarding the Yelensky call and and supposed quid pro quo.
thehill.com/policy/nationa…
As of the first week in August DOJ and the WH were aware of a complaint regarding the Yelensky call and and supposed quid pro quo.
thehill.com/policy/nationa…
2/ And given the way the process is described by DOJ, Trump was likely cleared by DOJ criminal division in mid August.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump…
abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump…
3/ Then in association with a visit by Pence to Poland, beginning of September, the claim is now that Sondland told the Ukrainians that the military aid was conditioned on the opening of investigations.
In the texts Taylor does not seem so certain.
cnn.com/interactive/20…
In the texts Taylor does not seem so certain.
cnn.com/interactive/20…
4/ And then subsequently, Sondland specifically says Taylor is wrong and there is no quid pro quo. He says this after talking to Trump. Is the claim now that Sondland lied on behalf of the President? Did he admit this in his testimony? Is there evidence he was lying?
5/ Look these people can circle jerk all they want and convince themselves of whatever they want but at the end of the day heresay and innuendo will not remove the duly elected President for a non crime.
6/ I will keep pointing out that, before Bill Taylor was hired, AG Barr publicly announced the opening of the investigation by Durham into the origins of the Trump Russia collusion hoax.
Ukraine is an epicenter.
That’s not an insignificant data point.
Ukraine is an epicenter.
That’s not an insignificant data point.
7/ There’s more to come. For those of you that are nervous, I get it. But you have to let this play out.
You know who is clearly not nervous?
Donald J. Trump
/end
You know who is clearly not nervous?
Donald J. Trump
/end
