Thread by @CliveWismayer

1/7

@bbclaurak is very stupid & may be worse. And the @BBCNews is biased & may be worse. There is an aspect of her disclosure of secret information yesterday no one (so far as I know) has mentioned. What if her source was playing her? What if the ..

.. postal vote outcome is not ‘pretty grim’ for Labour?

It’s only a few days ago she was the mouthpiece for a Göbbels-like slander against an innocent guy on a bike outside Leeds General Infirmary. Two sources (independent of each other were they Laura?) told her 100 ..

.. Labour ‘activists’ (WTF does that imply - military wing of the Labour party?) descended by taxi and one of them punched an aide.

You would think the humiliation, shame & sheer crass stupidity attending that palpably false story would have taught her a lesson, right? ..

.. She was ruthlessly & crudely used & fell for it like a mug but what is she doing only 2 days later? Parroting info given by a source, undoubtedly Tory, which might also turn out to be false but in a much more serious way.

Disseminating that info was useful to the Tories ..

.. true or not. The effect of doing so cannot be undone & we won’t find out the truth for a while (I don’t know how long).

If the BBC were not supporting her to the utmost, it would take stern disciplinary measures against both her & the producer of yesterday’s show ..

.. but it won’t & the grim record of the BBC in supporting the Tories in this election, in ways both obvious & subtle, explains why. The organisation is corrupt, notwithstanding the presence of some good people there. The overall picture is clear.

Were I a thug ..

.. like Farage I would say we should take a knife to them (what happened about that btw. - is he in jail yet?). I advocate instead a thorough enquiry into BBC bias with substantial reform &/or abolition as possible outcomes.

And Kuenssberg should go at once.