1) "The ... nation's scholars & historians overwhelmingly agree that impeachment is reserved under the Constitution ONLY for abuses of Presidential power that undermine the functioning of government or of Constitutional liberty." Rep Gerald Nadler (1998)
2) "There is far from sufficient evidence to support the allegations (which) even if proven true, do not rise to the level of impeachable offenses. This is clearly a partisan railroad job.
3) "You may have the votes. You may have the muscle. But you do not have the legitimacy of a national consensus or a Constitutional imperative. This partisan coup d'tat will go down in infamy in the history of this nation.
4) "The fact is there were no fact witnesses brought before the committee, there were no specific perjury quotes, and no specific alleged lies cited in the Articles (of Impeachment).
5) "And I ask the Republicans: Do you deny that the President admitted to an inappropriate relationship to the grand jury? And is it your beef that he wasn't graphic enough ... ?"
@threadreaderapp unroll 1) "The ... nation's scholars
