Here's a crazy idea: instead of telling me how many 4/5 star high school players a team has, tell me how many of them are 4/5 star players after 3 years
It's just hilarious listening to talking heads still insisting USC has far more "talent" than Iowa after that beatdown. Any objective review of that game will tell you Iowa was bigger, stronger, more skilled, and yes, FASTER than USC.
Ferentz is pretty good at developing players, but after a 2 year recruiting cycle that may produce 6 NFL first rounders (Fant Hockenson Epenesa Wirfs Jackson & maybe Stone), maybe he's also better at judging talent that anonymous chatroom randos
