This is important because it speaks to what these candidates would do as POTUS.
American voters deserve to know whether these individuals can be trusted to defend them against threats
American voters deserve to know whether these individuals can be trusted to defend them against threats
I was a fierce critic of Obama’s approach on FP, but he did repeatedly do what was required on that front (OBL etc).
By claiming this was an “assassination,” Warren and Bernie aren’t just disputing whether taking out Soleimani was prudent, but whether it was legitimate.
By claiming this was an “assassination,” Warren and Bernie aren’t just disputing whether taking out Soleimani was prudent, but whether it was legitimate.
If they don’t think taking out the heads of terrorist groups is even legitimate, that is a serious concern that should be highlighted to voters.
It signals they will not protect Americans against those threats.
It signals they will not protect Americans against those threats.
