I think House should subpoena Bolton b/c McConnell wont guarantee witnesses
He claims that happened w/Clinton,but there SenMaj leader didnt say “there will be no difference between the president’s position and our position” nor “There’s no chance president is going to be removed”
He claims that happened w/Clinton,but there SenMaj leader didnt say “there will be no difference between the president’s position and our position” nor “There’s no chance president is going to be removed”
McConnell is angling for a sham trial. No one (besides Trump) benefits from that. The whole point of a trial is to provide the public w/reassurance that the truth has been ferreted out. That's always impt, never more so than now, given Trump's Iran action washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/0…
@SpeakerPelosi has been absolutely right in her urgency around impeachment. But given that McConnell cant commit to even the most basic of truth-seeking (e.g., testimony from a witness whom the deft gagged, who now wants to testify),the need for truth > expediency of a sham trial
